Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$72kHousing & Shelter$48kReligion$35kYouth Development$24kEducation$23kHealth$19kCommunity Improvement$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$803k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA CLOTHES CLUB$3,400
COMMUNITY ONE INC$3,400
YWCA OF EVANSVILLE LIVE Y'ERS$3,400
AURORA INC$3,400
ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC$3,400
ST VINCENT EARLY LEARNING CENTER$3,400
THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE$3,400
EVANSVILLE POLICE FOUNDATION$3,400
YOUTH FIRST INC$3,400
PATCHWORK CENTRAL INC$3,400
BUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL BSA$2,000
PENSION FUND OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,000
CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$1,000
CHRISTIAN CHURCH DISCIPLES OF CHRIST$1,000
UNITED CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CARVER COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $2k → 15%CARVER COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $2k → 15%AURORA INC: $5k → 15%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $5k → 15%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $4k → 15%AURORA INC: $3k → 15%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $3k → 15%AURORA INC: $3k → 15%AURORA INC: $3k → 15%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $3k → 15%AURORA INC: $3k → 15%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $3k → 15%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $2k → 15%AURORA INC: $2k → 15%AURORA INC: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$208k · 17 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$208k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+173%

Still filing today

71%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthReligionEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AURORA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +30%
  • PC
    Patchwork Central Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +5%
  • YF
    YOUTH FIRST
    7× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOPE CITY NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +173%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
2
Community Connections for Children Inc

Ccc connects families to resources, collaborates with early childhood education programs, and engages with the community to create a foundation for children to be successful in life.

Human Services
3
Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.

Human Services
4
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
5
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
6
Adams County Children's Advocacy Center

To meet the needs of children and families in our community by providing a community based, child focused center that facilitates a compassionate multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, identification, investigation, prosecution and…

Crime & Legal
7
Family & Children's Council of Black Hawk County

To prevent child abuse and strengthen families.

Crime & Legal
8
Community Child Care Center of the Third Ward Inc

Provide a safe, caring, and dynamic environment to help nurture the development of pre-school aged children.

Human Services
9
Indiana Co Child Day Care Program

Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.

Human Services
10
Indiana County Head Start Inc

Provide early child development to disadvantaged children

Education
11
Kids Crossing

Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.

Human Services
12
Bentonville Child Care and Development Center Inc

Our purpose is to serve families by providing quality care and education for children six weeks of age through pre-kindergarten in a non-profit child development center and preschool.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carver Community Organization Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christian Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Patchwork Central Inc: $22,535 · OtherPatchwork Central IncPARENTING TIME CENTER INC: $16,385 · OtherPARENTING TIME CENTER INCST VINCENT EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $14,700 · OtherST VINCENT EARLY LEARNING CENTER INCCHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONUNITED CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY SOCIETY: $8,000 · OtherUNITED CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY SOCIETYCHRISTIAN CHURCH DISCIPLES OF CHRIST: $8,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN CHURCH DISCIPLES OF CHRISTPENSION FUND OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherPENSION FUND OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCHHOPE CITY NETWORK INC: $4,500 · Other+9 more: $24,100 · Other+9 moreAURORA INC: $23,600 · Human ServicesAURORA INCEVANSVILLE ARC INC: $19,285 · Human ServicesEVANSVILLE ARC INCALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $18,485 · Human ServicesALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INCCARVER COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCARVER COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION I…COMMUNITY ONE INC: $17,285 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY O…United Caring Shelters Inc: $6,800 · Housing & ShelterUnited Cari…YOUTH FIRST: $18,785 · HealthYOUTH FIR…IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,585 · EducationDream Center Evansville: $2,750 · ReligionARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$114,220Human Services$65,370Housing & Shelter$24,085Health$18,785Education$8,585Religion$2,750Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAURORA INC: $23,600 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPatchwork Central Inc: $22,535 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetEVANSVILLE ARC INC: $19,285 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $18,785 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $18,485 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ONE INC: $17,285 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPARENTING TIME CENTER INC: $16,385 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetST VINCENT EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $14,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,585 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetUnited Caring Shelters Inc: $6,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCARVER COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $2,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDream Center Evansville: $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AURORA INC ↗
  • Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
  • Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTING TIME CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds United Caring Shelters Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARVER COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Clothes Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dream Center Evansville ↗
  • Who funds ARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation IncIN30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · West Side Nut Club Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · United Way of Southwestern Indiana Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · Koch Foundation Inc · Edward Love Foundation · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph