· Private foundation
Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOUTH FIRST INC | $3,400 |
| PATCHWORK CENTRAL INC | $3,400 |
| ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC | $3,400 |
| SANTA CLOTHES CLUB | $3,400 |
| YWCA OF EVANSVILLE LIVE Y'ERS | $3,400 |
| COMMUNITY ONE INC | $3,400 |
| ST VINCENT EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $3,400 |
| THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE | $3,400 |
| EVANSVILLE POLICE FOUNDATION | $3,400 |
| AURORA INC | $3,400 |
| BUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL BSA | $2,000 |
| PENSION FUND OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $1,000 |
| CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CHURCH DISCIPLES OF CHRIST | $1,000 |
| UNITED CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY SOCIETY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AIAURORA INC8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +82%
- PCPatchwork Central Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +5%
- YFYOUTH FIRST7× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- HCHOPE CITY NETWORK INCone grant, 2024 · $5k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +173%
- SVST VINCENT CENTER FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2018 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.
Ccc connects families to resources, collaborates with early childhood education programs, and engages with the community to create a foundation for children to be successful in life.
To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.
Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…
To assist children who have been victims of abuse
To meet the needs of children and families in our community by providing a community based, child focused center that facilitates a compassionate multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, identification, investigation, prosecution and…
To prevent child abuse and strengthen families.
Provide a safe, caring, and dynamic environment to help nurture the development of pre-school aged children.
Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.
Provide early child development to disadvantaged children
Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.
Our purpose is to serve families by providing quality care and education for children six weeks of age through pre-kindergarten in a non-profit child development center and preschool.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carver Community Organization Inc and the most unlike its peers is Christian Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AURORA INC ↗
- Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE ARC INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
- Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ONE INC ↗
- Who funds PARENTING TIME CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Caring Shelters Inc ↗
- Who funds CARVER COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Clothes Club Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds Dream Center Evansville ↗
- Who funds ARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · West Side Nut Club Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · United Way of Southwestern Indiana Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · Koch Foundation Inc · Edward Love Foundation · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mamie L Young Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.