Skip to content
Malcolm Wesley Myers and Anna at a glance

· Private foundation

Malcolm Wesley Myers and Anna

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$990kRecreation & Sports$19kHealth$3kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,200
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MESSIAH UNIVERSITY$3,200
ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$3,200
YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA$3,200
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY$3,200
DICKINSON COLLEGE$3,200
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$3,200
ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$3,200
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$3,200
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$3,200
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$3,200
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$3,200
SALISBURY UNIVERSITY$3,200
GENEVA COLLEGE$3,200
SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY$3,200
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$3,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%URSINUS COLLEGE: $3k → 7%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%WILSON COLLEGE: $3k → 9%YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3k → 9%MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $3k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%GENEVA COLLEGE: $3k → 10%ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $3k → 11%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%LYCOMING COLLEGE: $3k → 12%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $3k → 13%DANIELLE KLUNK CO PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%BERRY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%MCDANIEL COLLEGE: $3k → 6%MOUNT ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $3k → 6%TOWSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%SALISBURY UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%WILSON COLLEGE: $3k → 9%YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3k → 9%FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE: $3k → 9%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%EMILY FROCK CO Lebanon Valley College: $3k → 11%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $3k → 8%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%MESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
WV
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$712k · 86 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

86 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
91

Total granted

$712k
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+9%

Still filing today

27%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • YC
    YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA
    4× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +24%
  • EC
    ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • HA
    Harrisburg Area Community College-Gettys
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • NS
    NC STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
6
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
8
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gettysburg College; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 183 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Millersville University: $24,281 · Other+149 more: $690,467 · Other+149 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $30,056 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $25,682 · EducationTemple University - Of The Common…YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $24,467 · EducationYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIAELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $22,654 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGEDICKINSON COLLEGE: $17,254 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGELEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $16,754 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGEWILSON COLLEGE: $13,428 · EducationMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $13,226 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $11,453 · Education+24 more: $124,390 · Education+24 more
Other$714,748Education$299,364

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $30,056 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $25,682 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $24,467 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $22,654 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $17,254 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $16,754 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILSON COLLEGE: $13,428 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $13,428 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $13,226 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $11,453 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $9,740 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY: $7,026 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA COLLEGE: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $6,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $6,026 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $5,726 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $3,514 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRICK HENRY COLLEGE: $3,514 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $3,514 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURSINUS COLLEGE: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3,026 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYMOUNT MANHATTAN COLLEGE: $3,026 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $3,026 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY: $3,026 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $3,026 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STEVENSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W W & Lucretia Hafer …Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
W W & Lucretia Hafer Scholarship TuwNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W W & Lucretia Hafer Scholarship Tuw · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Malcolm Wesley Myers and Anna funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Malcolm Wesley Myers and Anna. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Stevenson University: 0% of income from government
  • Mount Saint Mary's University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 183 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Malcolm Wesley Myers and Anna’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home