· Private foundation
Mal Bdl Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $335k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $545k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACHILLES INTERNATIONAL INC | $250,000 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT INC | $200,000 |
| PROJECT TORAH AND BIBLE SCHOLARSHIP INC | $80,000 |
| UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON FRIENDS AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | $59,400 |
| EXTEND | $55,250 |
| WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC | $50,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $50,000 |
| V-DAY | $50,000 |
| TIKKUN OLAM PRODUCTIONS INCORPORATED | $45,000 |
| BRIDGE INSTITUTE INC | $45,000 |
| IF NOT NOW EDUCATION FUND | $40,000 |
| ALBI FUND INSTITUTE & LAB | $30,000 |
| TELLURIDE ADAPTIVE SKI PROGRAM | $26,000 |
| UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NY INC | $25,000 |
| SHEFA SCHOOL | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSHEFA SCHOOL7× · 2019–2025 · $956k · revenue +194%
- ATACADEMIC TORAH INSTITUTE INC6× · 2019–2025 · $560k · revenue +61% · 30% of their budget
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC6× · 2019–2025 · $520k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- AFASSOCIATION FOR PROMOTION OF JEWISH SECULARISM INCone grant, 2024 · $210k · revenue 0%
- HIHIAS INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -6%
New Urban Artsgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…
Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.
To develop, strengthen, and learn from nonprofit, philanthropic, public, as well as other projects, organizations, and networks that benefit society by advancing civic engagement, community-building, culture, education, religion, service,…
Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.
To educate, enrich and empower visually impaired people across israel to achieve their full potential and become contributing members of society.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Forward Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wolf Pack Support Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHEFA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIC TORAH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EXTEND ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR PROMOTION OF JEWISH SECULARISM INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON FRIENDS & ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY ↗
- Who funds Tikkun Olam Productions Inc ↗
- Who funds NON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds IF NOT NOW EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
- Who funds V-Day ↗
- Who funds FORWARD LEAP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New Urban Arts ↗
- Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ROOTS ↗
- Who funds The Forward Association Inc ↗
- Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds ALBI FUND INSTITUTE AND LAB ↗
- Who funds REELABILITIES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
- Who funds T'RUAH ↗
- Who funds B'TSELEM INC ↗
- Who funds Just Vision Inc ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Impactassetsinc · Topol Family Foundation Inc · New Israel Fund · Proteus Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Marietta and Andrew Romay Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Foundation for Middle East Peace · The Nathan Cummings Foundation Inc · Fjc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mal Bdl Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.