Skip to content

· Private foundation

Makulinski Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$100kHuman Services$75kInternational$73kPhilanthropy$44kReligion$43kEnvironment$43kArts & Culture$39kAnimals$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PHILLIP LUTHERAN CHURCH$14,900
TOLEDO HELPS UKRAINE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE$8,030
Individual grant recipient$5,100
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$5,000
MISCELLANEOUS 1000$4,820
RAILS TO TRAILS$4,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$3,000
OXFAM$2,000
GEORGIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING$1,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,500
SUSAN G KOMEN FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GREATER TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PALMETTO CYCLING COALITION: $2k → 16%NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE: $8k → 9%NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE: $4k → 9%NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE: $1k → 9%American Red Cross: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$352k · 28 repeat orgs$217k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
39

Total granted

$352k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+13%

Still filing today

46%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $21k · revenue +113%
  • PS
    PERRYSBURG SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +24%
  • NG
    NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • R
    ROTARY
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • AP
    AMERICAN POLISH CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • YM
    YMCA - MYRTLE
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
2
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
3
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
10
Toxic-Free Future F/K/a Washington Toxics Coalition

As a national leader in environmental health research and advocacy, toxic- free future uses the power of science, education, and activism, to drive strong laws and corporate responsibility that protect the health of all people and the…

Environment
11
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
12
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toledo Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Toledo Helps Ukraine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Miscellaneous 1000: $57,350 · OtherMiscellaneous 1000ROTARY: $21,967 · OtherUNITED WAY: $21,891 · OtherST PHILLIP LUTHERAN CHURCH: $21,591 · OtherLEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS INC: $21,325 · OtherAMERICAN POLISH CULTURAL CENTER: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,715 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,600 · OtherYMCA - MYRTLE: $18,202 · OtherRotary Club of Ann Arbor: $17,265 · OtherPERRYSBURG SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Other+47 more: $181,756 · Other+47 moreTOLEDO HELPS UKRAINE: $15,000 · Human ServicesNORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC: $12,955 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 · Human ServicesPALMETTO CYCLING COALITION: $2,450 · Human ServicesLUCAS COUNTY PIT CREW: $32,100 · AnimalsWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $12,050 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $7,000 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $4,500 · EnvironmentFoothills Community Foundation: $20,625 · PhilanthropyTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,500 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $5,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $5,000 · InternationalTHE DOVE FUND: $1,000 · InternationalTOLEDO REPERTOIRE COMPANY: $10,600 · Arts & CultureTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $1,750 · Arts & CultureVAGABOND SCHOOL OF THE DRAMA INC: $1,300 · Arts & CultureTHE WAREHOUSE THEATRE: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$435,662Human Services$38,405Animals$32,100Environment$23,550Philanthropy$21,625International$21,500Arts & Culture$17,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUCAS COUNTY PIT CREW: $32,100 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetLEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS INC: $21,325 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFoothills Community Foundation: $20,625 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPERRYSBURG SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $14,136 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC: $12,955 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $12,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO REPERTOIRE COMPANY: $10,600 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF TOLEDO: $3,985 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBRIGHTER CHRISTMAS FUND INC: $3,510 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNORTH GREENVILLE CRISIS MINISTRY I: $3,251 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGirl Scouts of Historic Georgia Inc: $2,717 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP AMPLIFY INC: $1,929 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,312 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAGABOND SCHOOL OF THE DRAMA INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WAREHOUSE THEATRE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOVE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Door Ministry Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUCAS COUNTY PIT CREW ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PERRYSBURG SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO REPERTOIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · Dana Charitable Foundation · Promedica Health System Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Makulinski Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Makulinski Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Makulinski Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Makulinski Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Makulinski Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph