Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Makoff Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$251kHealth$200kEducation$157kCivil Rights$80kArts & Culture$54kCrime & Legal$46kYouth Development$44kEnvironment$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $131k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cedars-Sinai$21,000
Planned Parenthood$20,000
Brennan Center for Justice$20,000
Michael J Fox Fdn$20,000
PBS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Sandals Fdn Jamaica Emergency Relief$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Doctors without Borders$7,000
Brave Trails$5,000
Tree Academy$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Boys Town: $5k → 12%HELPING HAND: $4k → 8%LITTLE STAR FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%Boys Town: $2k → 12%Little Star Foundation: $2k → 13%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%Little Star Foundation: $2k → 13%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%Little Star Foundation: $2k → 13%Boys Town: $1k → 12%LITTLE STAR FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%Boys Town: $1k → 12%People Concern: $3k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $3k → 14%People Concern: $2k → 14%Ocean Park Community Center: $1k → 14%Ocean Park Community Center: $1k → 14%Ocean Park Community Center: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AR
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Makoff Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 42% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Makoff Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$913k · 59 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

59 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
21

Total granted

$913k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+11%

Still filing today

54%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    8× · 2017–2024 · $66k · revenue +76%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $46k · revenue +213%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • UF
    UCLA FOUNDER'S FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • ME
    Morrocco Earthquake WCK UNICEF
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
5
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
10
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
11
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
12
American Psychological Association

American psychological association is a national membership organization created to promote the advancement, communication, and application of psychological science and knowledge to benefit society and improve lives. apa fulfills these…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Pilot Light Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Community Health CentersEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Food Pantries & AssistanceChristian Youth CampsElementary Literacy TutoringLgbtq+ Community CentersEducation Equity LeadershipSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Independent K-8 SchoolsClassical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Child and Family ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr13%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr13%38%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,940

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
24/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUCLA — $44,000 · OtherUCLAPlanned Parenthood — $32,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodPBS — $26,000 · OtherTHIRD WAY — $25,000 · OtherTHE PILOT LIGHT FOUNDATION — $19,500 · Other+47 more — $293,690 · Other+47 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $65,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUN…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $30,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MED…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $20,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…SEEDS OF PEACE INC — $16,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF PEACE IN…LOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL — $13,560 · InternationalLOS ANGELES WORLD…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $7,000 · International+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $55,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BREN…Coalition for Engaged Education — $20,000 · EducationCoalition for …VASA Educational Services — $20,000 · EducationVASA Education…SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $16,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEE…BARBERSHOP BOOKS INC — $14,000 · EducationBARBERSHOP BOO…TREE ACADEMY — $5,000 · Education+2 more — $4,000 · EducationTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $46,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $34,500 · HealthCEDARS-SINA…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $14,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…WORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $12,000 · HealthWORLDWIDE F…+1 more — $250 · HealthFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $13,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE STAR FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $10,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesBrave Trails — $9,000 · Civil RightsNational Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance Inc dba NQAPIA — $9,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $6,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $4,000 · Civil Rights350ORG — $20,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Environment
Other$535,190International$153,060Education$134,000Health$106,750Human Services$37,500Civil Rights$28,000Environment$25,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $65,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $46,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $34,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition for Engaged Education — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVASA Educational Services — $20,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PILOT LIGHT FOUNDATION — $19,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC — $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $16,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBARBERSHOP BOOKS INC — $14,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL — $13,560 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE — $12,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $12,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLITTLE STAR FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrave Trails — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNational Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance Inc dba NQAPIA — $9,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLiving Jazz — $8,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREE ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
  • Who funds 350ORG
  • Who funds Coalition for Engaged Education
  • Who funds VASA Educational Services
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds THE PILOT LIGHT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds BARBERSHOP BOOKS INC
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB
  • Who funds STAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND
  • Who funds LITTLE STAR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds Brave Trails

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Liberty Hill FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Liberty Hill Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Makoff Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph