Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mako Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$384k
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$316kCivil Rights$297kEnvironment$239kCommunity Improvement$160kArts & Culture$159kEducation$151kHealth$128kRecreation & Sports$105kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $295k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$25,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$25,000
TYPE MEDIA CENTER (FKA THE NATION INSTITUTE)$20,000
MOVEMENT VOTER FUND VIA TIDES FOUNDATION$20,000
STREETSQUASH$20,000
CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH INC$20,000
PROTEUS FUND - RISE TOGETHER FUND$15,000
BLACK FARMER FUND$15,000
PROTEUS FUND - PIPER FUND$15,000
COLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE$10,000
PARTNERS FOR JUSTICE$10,000
CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY$10,000
BARD COLLEGE - BARD PRISON INITIATIVE$10,000
FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$10,000
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER (ILRC)$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIDES CENTER: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 62 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

62 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
7

Total granted

$1.7M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+40%

Still filing today

71%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +26%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +17%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +40%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTINGgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +137%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - NEW ENGLAND LITERATURE PROGRAM (NEL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
40/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TYPE MEDIA CENTER (FKA THE NATION INSTITUTE): $90,000 · OtherTYPE MEDIA CENTER (FKA THE NATION INSTITUTE)COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING (FKA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY LO: $85,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING (FKA NORTHERN CALIFORNI…PROTEUS FUND - PIPER FUND: $75,000 · OtherPROTEUS FUND - PIPER FUNDREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONCENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH INC: $100,000 · OtherCENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH INCBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $55,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $50,000 · Other+49 more: $554,376 · Other+49 morePROTEUS FUND INC: $75,000 · EducationPROTEUS FU…UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…RETHINKING SCHOOLS LIMITED: $25,000 · EducationRETHINKING…CAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationCAMP NEBAG…HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $17,000 · EducationHAMPSHIRE …BARD COLLEGE: $10,000 · Education+8 more: $12,650 · Education+8 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $125,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL R…LONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS SOCIETY: $15,000 · EnvironmentLONG ISLA…PERENNIAL: $14,000 · EnvironmentPERENNIALCONCERNED CITIZENS OF MONTAUK: $10,000 · EnvironmentCONCERNED…+3 more: $10,000 · Environment+3 moreINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $100,000 · InternationalINTERNATI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $60,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …+1 more: $4,000 · InternationalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $100,000 · HealthGO DOC GO INC: $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $15,000 · HealthHEALTHCONNECT ONE: $8,000 · Health+2 more: $10,000 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $100,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalSTREETSQUASH INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP NEBAGAMON: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,074,376Education$189,650Environment$174,000International$164,000Health$153,000Crime & Legal$115,000Recreation & Sports$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH INC: $100,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $50,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRETHINKING SCHOOLS LIMITED: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJobs with Justice Education Fund: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGO DOC GO INC: $20,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetWALLKILL VALLEY LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR MACULAR DISEASEINC: $20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS SOCIETY: $15,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPERENNIAL: $14,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetWAMC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS OF MONTAUK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHCONNECT ONE: $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRUTHOUT: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WRITING PROJECT CORPORATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP NEBAGAMON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEQUINE RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HAMPTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK FARMER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds RETHINKING SCHOOLS LIMITED ↗
  • Who funds Jobs with Justice Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds GO DOC GO INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WALLKILL VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR MACULAR DISEASEINC ↗
  • Who funds HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds PERENNIAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Novo Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Thomas & Corinne Nyquist Foundation · The Newcombe Foundation · Rotonda Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mako Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mako Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • World Learning Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mako Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mako Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mako’s filings →

More from the funding graph