Skip to content

· Private foundation

Making It Happen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$118kYouth Development$34kEmployment$18kHealth$10kArts & Culture$6kReligion$6kHuman Services$2kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,361
Median grant
3
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BASE CAMP CODING ACADEMY$5,425
EMBRACE KIDS FOUNDATION$4,361
Individual grant recipient$818
KAPPA DELTA FOUNDATION$387
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELEVATION SCHOLARS: $25 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
OR
OH
NJ
KY
VA
TN
NC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Making It Happen Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Making It Happen Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$155k · 5 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$155k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+13%

Still filing today

80%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $387 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +33%
  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +28%
  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN MEMPHIS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIGHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • LG
    LINDEN GROVE SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +182%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
2
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
3
Girls Global Academy Public Charter School

Girls global academy public charter school (gga) was incorporated in the district of columbia in june 2019 and opened its doors in august 2020 fostering pathways to lead and learn. as an all-girls public charter high school, gga ignites…

—
4
Valor Collegiate Academies

To prepare a diverse student population for success in college and to live inspired and purposeful lives. our scholars will graduate with academic skills, social-emotional skills, and positive character strengths that rival the outcomes of…

Education
5
Stoneleigh-Burnham School

Stoneleigh-burnham school is an academic community that fosters an international perspective. we inspire girls to pursue meaningful lives based on honor, respect, and intellectual curiosity. each student is challenged to discover her best…

Education
6
Aspire Academy

Aspire is a community-based school committed to empower and educate all students to attainhigh academic performance while eliminating the achievement gap by delivering an engagin stem curriculum and meet the individual

Philanthropy
7
Intrepid College Preparatory School

Intrepid college prep is committed to ensuring our scholars, educators, and families have the opportunity to unlock an unlimited future. by providing rigorous academic instruction and creating powerful relationships amongst our community's…

Education
8
Delphi Schools Inc

Delphi school's mission is to draw out the best in every student through effective educational materials and empower young adults to bring positive change in the world through reason, creativity and integrity.

Education
9
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
10
Trinity Valley School

Trinity valley school has four main objectives for its students; fine scholarship with its fulfillment at college; the development of wide constructive interests; intelligent citizenship; and spiritual and moral development which promotes…

Education
11
Achievement House Charter School

It is the mission of the achievement house cyber charter school to provide all students with an experience that is complete with improved personal outcome and academic success and achievement in a rich and personalized learning environment…

Education
12
Sea Crest School Inc

Sea crest school is dedicated to providing the best in innovative education to inspire and empower our learners to engage curiosity, express creativity, act with compassion and lead with courage.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Institute for Children With Cancer and Blood Disorders Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $124,391 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHIGHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · OtherHIGHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $6,000 · Other+7 more: $14,866 · Other+7 moreBASE CAMP CODING ACADEMY: $17,581 · EducationBASE CAMP CODI…LINDEN GROVE SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationLINDEN GROVE S…+2 more: $412 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,200 · HealthTHE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC: $4,371 · HealthGIRLS ON THE RUN MEMPHIS: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentFINAL SALUTE INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $25 · Human Services
Other$155,257Education$25,493Health$9,571Youth Development$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,000Human Services$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBASE CAMP CODING ACADEMY: $17,581 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetLINDEN GROVE SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC: $4,371 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN MEMPHIS: $3,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFINAL SALUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKAPPA DELTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $387 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESTIN HIGH SCHOOL INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BASE CAMP CODING ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LINDEN GROVE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds FINAL SALUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA DELTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DESTIN HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Making It Happen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Making It Happen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Destin High School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Making It Happen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Making It Happen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Making It Happen’s filings →

More from the funding graph