Skip to content

· Public charity

Main Street Ventures

Promote regional economic development by providing a physical structure to start-up and emerging technology businesses; to educate the regional business communities on technology issues and opportunities; to provide a forum for the dissemination of ideas, technology, business practices, and other information among regional technology…

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.0MCommunity Improvement$815kYouth Development$736kArts & Culture$654kScience & Tech$424kHealth$239kRecreation & Sports$140kHousing & Shelter$140kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $192,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $198,350 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $170k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALE TECHNOLOGIES$30,000
NOTEWORTHY CO$17,000
IDYLLWILD FARM$13,000
MPI CONSULTING$10,000
SKIN BY BROWNLEE$10,000
BIRDIE BOUND$10,000
THE RECIPE BOOK$10,000
METEORA3D$10,000
AARON WEARABLE TECH$10,000
AZELO LLC$10,000
STORM SECURED SERVICES$10,000
TASTE OF BOUJIE LLC$10,000
SILUX$10,000
SPORK SCIENTIFIC LLC$10,000
LYCEUM AI INC$9,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GENER8TOR MANAGEMENT LLC: $50k → 11%SOUNDTRACE LLC: $30k → 6%INPHLU: $30k → 16%THE EMPANADAS BOX: $30k → 11%OPEN BAY AUTO AL: $30k → 6%REV3D: $30k → 9%COOLER KEG: $30k → 11%BLACK ACHIEVERS: $50k → 12%CUTMAN BARBERSHOP: $30k → 16%THE BODYBAKERY & CO: $30k → 10%LOCAL COMPOST: $30k → 11%VALE TECHNOLOGIES: $30k → 9%LULU'S SWEET BITES: $30k → 12%CONCERTED INC: $30k → 16%QLICIOUS LLC: $30k → 12%CACKLEBERRY: $30k → 16%JUST QIN BBQ: $30k → 16%CINCY NICE SOCIAL HOUSE: $30k → 16%IN THE CURIOUS KITCHEN: $30k → 10%BROOKES AND HYDE: $30k → 16%CORK N CRUST BELLEVUE: $30k → 11%CINCY SWEETS BY LIZ: $30k → 16%QUEEN CITY CERTIFIED: $30k → 16%LIVE N LEARN LLC: $30k → 16%MODICA: $30k → 16%HERBAN VEGANS: $30k → 16%SEW VALLEY: $30k → 16%LAYLEE LLC: $30k → 16%MICROMERCH LLC: $30k → 16%WYOMING COMMUNITY COFFEE: $30k → 16%THE AREPA PLACE LLC: $30k → 16%RIVERS EDGE CONSULTING: $30k → 16%WILDWEED: $30k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI MICROENTERPRISE INITIATIVE INC: $100k → 16%BLACK ACHIEVERS: $50k → 16%BLACK ACHIEVERS: $30k → 16%INNOVATIONS GIRLS: $30k → 16%BOSA LLC: $35k → 16%OVER THE RHINE REVITILIZATION CORPORATION: $100k → 16%UNTOLD CONTENT: $55k → 16%3CDC: $50k → 16%HEADS UP GOGGLES LLC (REKKIE): $40k → 16%TUTOR TEENS: $40k → 16%BOSA LIFE: $30k → 16%MAD CHEESE LLC: $30k → 16%HOME TEAM SERVICES LLC: $30k → 16%YEE MAMA: $30k → 16%ABBA CARE INC: $35k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$617k · 12 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
184

Total granted

$617k
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+51%

Still filing today

25%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BLACK ACHIEVERS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +116%
  • C
    Cintrifuse
    5× · 2019–2025 · $48k · revenue +10%
  • KE
    KENTUCKY ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION NETWORK INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • OT
    OVER THE RHINE REVITALIZATION CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -91%
  • GC
    Greater Cincinnati Microenterprisegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +40%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CncyMade

Cncy Made exists to build and support a vibrant manufacturing sector in the Greater Cincinnati region that sustains companies producing locally-made products, encourages entrepreneurship and innovation and creates employment opportunities…

—
2
Flywheel Social Enterprise Hub

Through workshops, training programs and technical assistance, we help social entrepreneurs build ventures that deliver social impact.

Philanthropy
3
European-American Chamber of Commerce

To stimulate business and networking relations between europe and the cincinnati tri-state region through education, exchanges, trade missions, increasing awareness, enhancing the region and europe's image, providing information &…

Community Improvement
4
Endeavor Louisville Inc

Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…

International
5
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
6
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
7
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—
8
Ohio Business Leadership Network
—
9
Allied Construction Industries Cincinnati

Aci's mission is to grow the cincinnati region's commercial construction industry.

—
10
Center for Creative Economy

Since its founding in 2011, The focus of the Center for Creative EconomyCCE has been to provide programming for inception and early-stage businesses to expand their ability to emerge as viable entrepeneurs. CCEs inclusive, customized…

Community Improvement
11
The Verge Entrepreneurship Hub Foundation
Community Improvement
12
Zworks

Founded in 2015, zWORKS is a non-profit organization located in the heart of the Zionsville village that provides resources, programming, and shared work spaces for entrepreneurs, startups, freelancers and remote workers. The mission of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cintrifuse; the most unlike its peers is Black Achievers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+188 more: $4,543,407 · Other+188 moreOVER THE RHINE REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $100,000 · Community ImprovementGreater Cincinnati Microenterprise: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 · Community ImprovementCintrifuse: $48,300 · Community ImprovementCorporation for Findlay Market: $30,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $20,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK ACHIEVERS INC: $140,000 · EducationKENTUCKY ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION NETWORK INC: $20,000 · EducationSEW VALLEY: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMortar Cincinnati: $20,000 · EmploymentHorizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,543,407Community Improvement$348,300Education$160,000Arts & Culture$30,000Employment$20,000Philanthropy$10,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACK ACHIEVERS INC: $140,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetOVER THE RHINE REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGreater Cincinnati Microenterprise: $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCintrifuse: $48,300 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCorporation for Findlay Market: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSEW VALLEY: $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMortar Cincinnati: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetKENTUCKY ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION NETWORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetOVER THE RHINE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHorizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVENTURE FOR AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUrban Manufacturing Alliance Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK ACHIEVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OVER THE RHINE REVITALIZATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Cincinnati Microenterprise ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds Cintrifuse ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Urban League of Greater Southwestern Ohio IncOH30.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Urban League of Greater Southwestern Ohio Inc · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · The Raymond C and Anna T Johnson Foundation · First Financial Foundation · George & Margaret McLane Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Main Street Ventures funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Main Street Ventures. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 212 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Main Street Ventures’ filings →

    More from the funding graph