Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mahan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$290k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$233kHealth$224kReligion$218kHuman Services$200kEnvironment$187kCommunity Improvement$135kEducation$129kArts & Culture$74kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $103k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Chest of Oldham Co$60,000
Creasy Mahan Nature Preserve$45,000
Hope Health Clinic$22,000
Oldham County Community Scholarships$21,000
Cedar Lake Foundation$14,000
Oldham Co Historical Society$13,000
Hosparus$12,000
Mallory Taylor Foundation$7,000
Sojourn Church$7,000
Shiloh United Methodist Church$7,000
St John Community Church$7,000
Bellewood Brooklawn$6,000
Wayside Christian Mission$5,000
Highpoint Charitable Services$5,000
Operation Parent$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Home of the Innocents: $2k → 15%Home of the Innocents: $2k → 15%Home of the Innocents: $1k → 15%Home of the Innocents: $1k → 15%Cabbage Patch Settlement House: $3k → 15%Cabbage Patch Settlement House: $3k → 15%Cabbage Patch Settlement House: $3k → 15%Cabbage Patch Settlement House: $3k → 15%Cabbage Patch Settlement House: $2k → 15%Cabbage Patch Settlement House: $1k → 15%Wayside Christian Mission: $6k → 15%Wayside Christian Mission: $5k → 15%Wayside Christian Mission: $5k → 15%Cedar Lake Foundation: $10k → 15%Cedar Lake Foundation: $10k → 15%Cedar Lake Foundation: $8k → 15%Cedar Lake Foundation: $7k → 15%Cedar Lake Foundation: $14k → 15%Cedar Lake Foundation: $12k → 15%Pillar: $3k → 4%Pillar: $3k → 4%Pillar: $3k → 4%Pillar: $3k → 4%Pillar: $3k → 4%Pillar: $3k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 43 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
9

Total granted

$1.5M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-22%

Still filing today

51%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOPE HEALTH CLINIC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $117k · revenue +106%
  • OC
    OLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $104k · revenue +40%
  • CM
    CREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • CC
    Christ Church of Goshen
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SC
    SOJOURN CHURCH NORTH
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • CF
    Centerstone Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
2
Kentucky Senior Citizens Apartments Inc

Provide staffing and services to operate apartment complexes for senior citizens in northern kentucky.

—
3
Ccmh Corporation

Provide a healthcare facility offering acure care, skilled care, outpatient services, and emergency medical services to residents of carroll county, kentucky and surrounding areas.

Health
4
Grace Community Health Center Inc

The mission of Grace Health is to show the love and share the truth of Jesus Christ to southeastern Kentucky through access to compassionate, high quality primary health care for the whole person.

Health
5
Community Health Centers of Western Kentucky Inc

To provide affordable primary healthcare services in muhlenberg and logan counties, kentucky, and in medically under-served urban, suburban, and rural areas having limited available health resources.

Health
6
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
7
HealthFirst Bluegrass Inc

Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.

Health
8
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
9
Healthpoint Family Care Inc

To be the best provider of health services through compassion, innovation and excellence.

Health
10
Cave Run Area Habitat for Humanity Inc

Provide low cost housing in cave run lake area of ky

—
11
Community Action Kentucky Inc

To advocate programs providing assistance to persons in low income environments to have adequate food, shelter, healthcare, education, water, waste and a sustainable home.

Community Improvement
12
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mallory Taylor Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Chest of Oldham Co: $115,000 · OtherCommunity Chest of Oldham CoCREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE INC: $100,000 · OtherCREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE INCCreasy Mahan Nature Preserve: $87,000 · OtherCreasy Mahan Nature PreserveMALLORY TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 · OtherSt John Methodist Church: $38,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN CARE COMMUNITIES INC: $37,000 · OtherGRACE & GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $31,000 · OtherSojourn Church: $28,000 · OtherShiloh United Methodist Church: $28,000 · Other+29 more: $261,000 · Other+29 moreHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $71,000 · Human ServicesHOSPARUS INC H…CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $61,000 · Human ServicesCEDAR LAKE FOU…WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $31,000 · Human ServicesWAYSIDE CHRIST…APPLE PATCH COMMUNITY INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesAPPLE PATCH CO…CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCABBAGE PATCH …+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CHEST OF OLDHAM COUNTY: $188,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY CHE…HOPE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $117,000 · HealthHOPE HEALTH …OPERATION PARENT: $38,000 · HealthOPERATION PA…USPIRITUS INC (BELLEWOOD & BROOKLAWN): $18,000 · HealthUSPIRITUS IN…OLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP: $104,000 · EducationOLDHAM CO…THE DEPAUL SCHOOL INC: $13,000 · EducationTHE DEPAU…KRIS LANDERS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationKRIS LAND…OLDHAM COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $74,000 · Arts & CultureHIGHPOINT CHARITABLE SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionDARE TO CARE INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$764,000Human Services$202,000Philanthropy$188,000Health$173,000Education$127,000Arts & Culture$74,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY CHEST OF OLDHAM COUNTY: $188,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetHOPE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $117,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetOLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP: $104,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetCREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE INC: $100,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetOLDHAM COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $74,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $71,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $61,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMALLORY TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetOPERATION PARENT: $38,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCHRISTIAN CARE COMMUNITIES INC: $37,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUSPIRITUS INC (BELLEWOOD & BROOKLAWN): $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF THE RIVER REGION: $18,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAPPLE PATCH COMMUNITY INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEWS SHELTER CORPORATION: $16,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHPOINT CHARITABLE SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DEPAUL SCHOOL INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKRIS LANDERS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEVERY SLICE MATTERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY CHEST OF OLDHAM COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds OLDHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds OLDHAM COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MALLORY TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION PARENT ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CARE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds USPIRITUS INC (BELLEWOOD & BROOKLAWN) ↗
  • Who funds THE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE RIVER REGION ↗
  • Who funds APPLE PATCH COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEWS SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHPOINT CHARITABLE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DEPAUL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds KRIS LANDERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY42.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Peyton Samuel Head Family Trust · Cralle Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Irvin F & Alice S Etscorn Charitable Foundation · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Sam Swope Family Foundation Inc · Raymond and Irene Wilborn Charitable Foundation C/O John Wilborn Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mahan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mahan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mahan Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mahan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mahan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph