Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mahala

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$20kHousing & Shelter$15kHuman Services$1kPhilanthropy$805Religion$713Education$300Youth Development$298Food & Nutrition$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $150
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$100
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Women Reaching Our Community Inc$21,500
Perry High School Band$100
Hospice Care Options Foundation in Central Georgia$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Operation Lunchbox Inc: $100 → 8%Women Reaching Our Community Inc: $22k → 11%Jolene Funderburk co Jess Funderbur: $350 → 18%Caroline Eckles co Grant Eckles: $350 → 20%Hospice Care Options Foundation in Central Georgia: $50 → 23%Marine Toys for Tots: $455 → 7%Grace Village: $517 → 11%Perry United Methodist Church Angel Tree: $363 → 11%Houston County Friends of the Library: $300 → 11%HALO Group of Middle Georgia: $300 → 11%Perry Volunteer Outreach Inc: $298 → 11%DFCS of Houston County Angel Tree co PUMC: $115 → 11%Perry High School Band: $100 → 11%Houston County Habitat for Humanity: $15k → 11%Brylea Wright co Christa Simmons: $350 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
2
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
3
Habitat for Humanity the Heart of Wyoming

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter
4
Houston County Share Inc

Provide food, medical and utility assistance

—
5
Homemade Hope for Homeless Children

Homemade Hope provides weekly cooking sessions, holiday celebrations, and community field trips to at-risk children living in the Houston area.

Human Services
6
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Building houses in partnership with god's people in need

—
7
Rebuilding Together Houston

Rebuilding Together Houston is the only organization in Houston and Harris County providing free home repairs to hundreds of families each year. We employ licensed contractors to restore homes to safe, livable conditions, extending each…

Housing & Shelter
8
Gadsden-Etowah Habitat for Humanity

Construction of Residential Housing for Low-income families

—
9
Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service

Our mission is to support low-income Texans efforts to achieve the American dream of a decent, affordable home in a quality neighborhood. We believe that Texas critical low-income housing and community development needs can best be solved…

Housing & Shelter
10
Hometown Habitat for Humanity Inc

Construct homes for needy families

—
11
Household of Faith Arlington Charities

To provide temporary assistance to needy families and individuals in tarrant county

Human Services
12
Habitat for Humanity of Bulloch County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston County Habitat for Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Halo Group of Middle Georgia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Women Reaching Our Community Inc: $21,500 · Housing & ShelterWomen Reaching Our Community IncRainbow House Childrens Resource Center Inc: $20,000 · Crime & LegalRainbow House Childrens Resource Cent…HOUSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $15,340 · OtherHOUSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT…+11 more: $2,893 · Other+11 moreMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $455 · PhilanthropyHouston County Friends of the Library Inc: $300 · EducationOPERATION LUNCHBOX INC: $100 · Religion
Housing & Shelter$21,500Crime & Legal$20,000Other$18,233Philanthropy$455Education$300Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWomen Reaching Our Community Inc: $21,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetRainbow House Childrens Resource Center Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHOUSTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $15,340 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $455 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HALO GROUP OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouston County Friends of the Library Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION LUNCHBOX INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robins Financial Credit UnionGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robins Financial Credit Union · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mahala funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mahala. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mahala?

    Find your warmest path to Mahala through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mahala’s filings →

    More from the funding graph