Skip to content

· Private foundation

Magnus Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$345k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$250k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

73% of Magnus Charitable Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
4
’18
4
’19
4
’20
1
’21
2
’22
1
’23
8
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$1.9MEducation$1.8MFood & Nutrition$58kHuman Services$54kArts & Culture$41kCrime & Legal$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$250,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT OF TEXAS$20,000
FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE OFFICERS FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
SUBURBAN SUGAR LAND WOMEN$5,000
PERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION$5,000
AERIAL RECOVERY$5,000
POPE JOHN PAUL II CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
MERCY HOME BOYS & GIRLS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UCP SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$721k · 12 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$721k
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+67%

Still filing today

42%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $155k · revenue +172%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $58k · revenue +97%
  • IA
    IMERMAN ANGELS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $43k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $559k
  • SR
    SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2020
    one grant, 2020 · $328k
  • SR
    SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2022
    one grant, 2022 · $298k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Holy Cross Hospital

The hospital is a catholic health care organization sponsored by the sisters of st. casimir. by our commitment to witness to the healing mission of jesus, we contribute to healthy communities and promote quality health care to all with…

Health
2
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
3
Rockford Health Physicians

To improve and protect the health and welfare of the community in accordance with our mission, the mission of rockford health physicians is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this…

Health
4
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Benefit, perform, and carry out the charitable, educational, and other exempt purposes of indiana university health ball memorial hospital, inc. ("iu health ball memorial hospital") and related organizations, and to support activities…

—
8
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
9
Institute for Applied Gerontology

The mjhs institute for innovation in palliative care is a not-for-profit organization. the institute is dedicated to promoting access to evidence-based, specialist-level palliative care for patients and families coping with serious or…

Human Services
10
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
11
Rush Copley Medical Center

To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
12
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Aerial Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $558,809 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2020: $327,732 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2020SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2022: $297,675 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2022SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2017: $211,983 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2017ROGERS MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 · OtherROGERS MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONSCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2019: $150,045 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2019SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2023: $102,175 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS PAID IN 2018: $99,925 · OtherMISC: $75,828 · Other+16 more: $253,091 · Other+16 moreMAYO CLINIC: $1,750,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+3 more: $68,000 · HealthROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $155,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $57,500 · Food & NutritionInnocence Project of Texas: $30,000 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterPERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Religion
Other$2,257,263Health$1,818,000Philanthropy$155,000Food & Nutrition$57,500Community Improvement$30,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,750,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $155,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $57,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $43,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetInnocence Project of Texas: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAbove and Beyond Family Recovery Center NFP: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds Innocence Project of Texas ↗
  • Who funds Above and Beyond Family Recovery Center NFP ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds PERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AERIAL RECOVERY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Magnus Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Magnus Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Magnus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph