Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maginnis Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Public Safety & Disaster$160kReligion$148kHealth$66kHuman Services$39kInternational$39kEducation$18kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDWARDS CENTER INC$10,000
ST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
EDWARDS CENTER$6,502
HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH$6,000
ST ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCHO$2,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,338
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%L'ARCHE PORTLAND: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 9 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$345k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+19%

Still filing today

44%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalHuman ServicesEmploymentEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EDWARDS CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $54k · revenue +25%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $6k · revenue +37%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $39k · revenue +33%
  • MA
    MOUNT ANGEL ABBEY & SEMINARY
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
  • LP
    LArche Portland
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arc Oregon

The arc of oregon, together with its network of members and affiliated chapters, advocates for the rights and full community participation of all children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
2
Goodlife Innovations Inc

Goodlife's mission is to make a meaningful difference in the everyday lives of individuals who need help to live more independently (individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities, brain injuries, physical or age-related…

Human Services
3
St Mary's Home

St. mary's home for boys is dedicated to providing high risk youth and their families the opportunity to become involved in change within an environment that embraces safety, security, and integrity, utilizing time tested, outcome oriented…

Human Services
4
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
5
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
6
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
8
Larche Noah Sealth of Seattle

To make known the gifts of people with developmental disabilities revealed through mutually transforming relationships. To engage in our diverse cultures, working together toward a more humane society. To foster community that is inspired…

Human Services
9
Mount Auburn Hospital

The mission of new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of patients. nebh strives to…

Health
10
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
11
Albertson Parkinsons Research
Health
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical Teams International; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $221,447 · OtherHOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCHTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $31,500 · OtherTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGONMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY & SEMINARY: $21,350 · OtherMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY & SEMINARY+20 more: $77,725 · Other+20 moreEDWARDS CENTER INC: $54,177 · EmploymentEDWARDS CENT…MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $38,599 · InternationalMEDICAL TE…OPERATION SMILE INC: $6,000 · InternationalOPERATION …LArche Portland: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,338 · EducationJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $250 · Public Benefit
Other$352,022Employment$54,177International$44,599Human Services$20,250Education$3,338Public Benefit$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDWARDS CENTER INC: $54,177 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $38,599 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $31,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLArche Portland: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,338 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S RESOURCES OF OREGON: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDWARDS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds LArche Portland ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S RESOURCES OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maginnis Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maginnis Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 59%
  • Edwards Center Inc: 79% of income from government
  • LArche Portland: 59% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maginnis’ filings →

More from the funding graph