Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maginnis Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Public Safety & Disaster$160kReligion$148kHealth$66kHuman Services$39kInternational$39kEducation$18kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDWARDS CENTER INC$10,000
ST WENCESLAUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
EDWARDS CENTER$6,502
HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH$6,000
ST ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCHO$2,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,338
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%L'ARCHE PORTLAND: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$345k · 9 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$345k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+8%

Still filing today

44%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalHuman ServicesEmploymentEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EDWARDS CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $54k · revenue +25%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $6k · revenue +37%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $39k · revenue +33%
  • MA
    MOUNT ANGEL ABBEY & SEMINARY
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
  • LP
    LArche Portland
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arc Oregon

The arc of oregon, together with its network of members and affiliated chapters, advocates for the rights and full community participation of all children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

2
Goodlife Innovations Inc

Goodlife's mission is to make a meaningful difference in the everyday lives of individuals who need help to live more independently (individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities, brain injuries, physical or age-related…

Human Services
3
St Mary's Home

St. mary's home for boys is dedicated to providing high risk youth and their families the opportunity to become involved in change within an environment that embraces safety, security, and integrity, utilizing time tested, outcome oriented…

Human Services
4
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
5
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
6
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
8
Larche Noah Sealth of Seattle

To make known the gifts of people with developmental disabilities revealed through mutually transforming relationships. To engage in our diverse cultures, working together toward a more humane society. To foster community that is inspired…

Human Services
9
Mount Auburn Hospital

The mission of new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of patients. nebh strives to…

Health
10
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
11
Albertson Parkinsons Research
Health
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical Teams International and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH — $221,447 · OtherHOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCHTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON — $31,500 · OtherTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGONMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY & SEMINARY — $21,350 · OtherMOUNT ANGEL ABBEY & SEMINARY+20 more — $77,725 · Other+20 moreEDWARDS CENTER INC — $54,177 · EmploymentEDWARDS CENT…MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $38,599 · InternationalMEDICAL TE…OPERATION SMILE INC — $6,000 · InternationalOPERATION …LArche Portland — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,338 · EducationJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $250 · Public Benefit
Other$352,022Employment$54,177International$44,599Human Services$20,250Education$3,338Public Benefit$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEDWARDS CENTER INC — $54,177 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $38,599 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON — $31,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLArche Portland — $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,338 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S RESOURCES OF OREGON — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDWARDS CENTER INC
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds THE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON
  • Who funds LArche Portland
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S RESOURCES OF OREGON
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maginnis Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 59%
  • Edwards Center Inc79% of income from government
  • LArche Portland59% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph