Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mabey Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$111kArts & Culture$15kEducation$8kPhilanthropy$5kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$1kCrime & Legal$1kHuman Services$300Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$148k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF$25,000
Individual grant recipient$4,296
Individual grant recipient$1,150
COOPERATIVE UMUTIMA KIGALI$1,000
COOPERATIVE ITEGANYIRI MUSANZE$507
PEACE HOUSE$100
MISCELLANEOUS$34
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $402) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $52 → 8%SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $200 → 6%PEACE HOUSE: $100 → 6%THE ROAD HOME: $50 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 7 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
38

Total granted

$125k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+39%

Still filing today

14%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP
    4× · 2021–2024 · $105k · revenue +15%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR ANCIENT AMERICAN STUDIES
    2× · 2021–2023 · $15k
  • M
    MISCELLANEOUS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
2
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
3
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
4
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
5
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
6
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
7
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
8
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
9
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
10
Crisis House

The mission of crisis house is to respond immediately to stop the cycle of domestic violence and homelessness and to connect families and individuals to crucial resources that empower them to renew their lives.

Human Services
11
Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence Inc

To provide safe shelter, support and advocacy for adults and their children, and to provide an end to violence against adults, youth and children through support, advocacy and community organizing.

Human Services
12
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Harbor Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Arema Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $105,321 · Public Safety & DisasterWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFPFOUNDATION FOR ANCIENT AMERICAN STUDIES: $15,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR ANCIENT AMERICAN STUDI…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,296 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,058 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,364 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS: $2,168 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,084 · OtherHONORING HEROES FOUNDATION: $2,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+34 more: $11,141 · Other+34 moreThe Community Foundation of Utah: $5,000 · PhilanthropySAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $200 · Human ServicesPeace House Inc: $100 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $52 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME: $50 · Human ServicesOUR RESCUE: $100 · Arts & CultureAREMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25 · Education
Public Safety & Disaster$105,321Other$54,147Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$402Arts & Culture$100Education$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $105,321 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Utah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONORING HEROES FOUNDATION: $2,036 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeace House Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAREMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of Utah ↗
  • Who funds HONORING HEROES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mabey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mabey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mabey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph