Skip to content

· Private foundation

M Lowell Edwards Foundation co US Bank

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$383kEducation$173kFood & Nutrition$66kArts & Culture$55kYouth Development$35kCivil Rights$30kAnimals$24kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY$56,000
UC DAVIS HEALTH SCIENCES DEVELOPMEN$15,000
LEGACY HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,000
OREGON SYMPHONY$7,000
SEE YA LATER FOUNDATION$6,000
AAUW NEVADA COUNTY BRANCH$6,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$4,000
REED COLLEGE$3,000
SATURDAY ACADEMY$2,000
SOUP KITCHEN AT ST BARNABAS$2,000
SMILE TRAIN$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
OR
CA
CO
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$755k · 26 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$755k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+29%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    6× · 2018–2023 · $40k · revenue +62%
  • SY
    SEE YA LATER FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +30%
  • TW
    THE WILSON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CC
    COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLINDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +463%
  • Partnership With Native Americans
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -33%
  • UR
    UC REGENTS
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
8
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
9
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
10
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Willamette University; the most unlike its peers is The Wilson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $193,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITYOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $103,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYNEWBERG PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $51,000 · OtherNEWBERG PUBLIC SCHOOLSUC DAVIS HEALTH SCIENCES DEVELOPMEN: $51,000 · OtherUC DAVIS HEALTH SCIENCES DEVELOPMENOREGON FOOD BANK: $40,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKSATURDAY ACADEMY: $24,100 · OtherIDA B WELLS HIGH SCHOOL: $24,000 · OtherAAUW NEVADA COUNTY BRANCH: $24,000 · Other+16 more: $151,400 · Other+16 moreSEE YA LATER FOUNDATION INC: $35,100 · EducationSEE YA LATER…AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $30,000 · EducationAMERICAN ASS…President and Fellows of Middlebury College: $13,800 · EducationPresident an…REED INSTITUTE: $10,000 · EducationREED INSTITU…+1 more: $2,800 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthLEGACY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $7,000 · HealthFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNevada Joint Union High Sch Dist Fnd: $8,000 · PhilanthropyOREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Arts & CulturePartnership With Native Americans: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$661,500Education$91,700Health$22,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Philanthropy$8,000Arts & Culture$7,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEE YA LATER FOUNDATION INC: $35,100 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILSON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND PETS HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $13,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $13,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNevada Joint Union High Sch Dist Fnd: $8,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetTURTLE RIDGE WILD LIFE CENTER: $8,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetOREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPartnership With Native Americans: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SEE YA LATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND PETS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Nevada Joint Union High Sch Dist Fnd ↗
  • Who funds TURTLE RIDGE WILD LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Partnership With Native Americans ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M Lowell Edwards Foundation co US Bank funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M Lowell Edwards Foundation co US Bank. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Reed Institute: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Symphony Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on M Lowell Edwards Foundation co US Bank’s filings →

More from the funding graph