Skip to content

· Private foundation

M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$103kEducation$99kHuman Services$88kCrime & Legal$43kYouth Development$36kReligion$31kFood & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
TWIN CITY MISSION$7,500
BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC$6,800
BOYS CLUBS OF BRAZOS COUNTY INC$5,000
PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY$5,000
HEALTH FOR ALL CLINIC INC$5,000
HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC$5,000
BRAZOS VALLEY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$5,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC$4,000
SCOTTYS HOUSE BRAZOS VALLEY CHILD ADVOCA$4,000
BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER INC$4,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOMES AND SERVICE: $5k → 10%A HOME BASE FOR TRANSITIONING FOSTER YOU: $2k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $5k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $5k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $5k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $5k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $5k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $4k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $4k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $4k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$425k · 17 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$425k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

76%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    Bryan ISD Education Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $75k · revenue +90%
  • TC
    Twin City Mission
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +35%
  • VF
    Voices for Children Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • BS
    BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANIgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brazos Valley Council on Alcohol and Substance Abuse

To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.

Health
2
Brazos Valley Affordable Housing Corporation

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…

Community Improvement
3
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
4
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
5
Brazos Employment Enterprises Dba the Bee Community

To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
6
Family Promise of Bryan-College Station

To assist homeless families in securing stable housing

Housing & Shelter
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of Van Zandt County Inc

The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.

Human Services
8
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
9
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
10
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
11
Casa for Kids of South Central Texas Inc

To recruit, train and supervise volunteers that advocate in the best interests of abused and neglected children in court.

Housing & Shelter
12
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bryan Isd Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Twin City Mission: $60,000 · OtherTwin City MissionFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPRESBYTERIAN PAN AMERICAN SCHOOL: $14,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN PAN AMERICAN SCHOOLSCOTTY'S HOUSE BRAZOS VALLEY: $9,000 · OtherSCOTTY'S HOUSE BRAZOS VALLEYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $7,000 · OtherS O S Ministries INC: $12,000 · OtherS O S Ministries INCPRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY: $5,000 · OtherBRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $8,915 · Other+3 moreBryan ISD Education Foundation: $75,000 · EducationBryan ISD Education F…Texas A&M Foundation: $10,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesHospice Brazos Vall…Voices for Children Inc: $31,000 · Human ServicesVoices for Children…PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDR…Unlimited Potential Inc: $3,660 · Human ServicesHealth for All Inc: $41,000 · HealthHealth for All In…BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $22,000 · HealthBRAZOS VALLEY REH…Scottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc: $8,000 · HealthScottys House Bra…BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $26,300 · Food & NutritionBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentBrazos Valley Museum of Natural History: $22,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$144,915Education$85,000Human Services$79,660Health$71,000Food & Nutrition$26,300Youth Development$24,000Arts & Culture$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBryan ISD Education Foundation: $75,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetTwin City Mission: $60,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHealth for All Inc: $41,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $40,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVoices for Children Inc: $31,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $26,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBrazos Valley Museum of Natural History: $22,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $22,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetS O S Ministries INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetScottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnlimited Potential Inc: $3,660 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetS O S MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bryan ISD Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
  • Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds Voices for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
  • Who funds S O S Ministries INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Scottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Unlimited Potential Inc ↗
  • Who funds S O S MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nina Heard Astin Charitable TrustMO37× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation · Mervin and Annete Peters Family Foundation · Orr James Donald Charitable Trust · Virginia & Christian Groneman Charitable · Orr Carl and Lena Charitable Trust · Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on M Bookman Peters’ filings →

    More from the funding graph