Skip to content

· Private foundation

M&T Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$564kPhilanthropy$90kEmployment$72kYouth Development$40kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$25,000
SCHOLARSHOT$12,000
RISE TOGETHER EDUCATION INC$10,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS$10,000
UPLIFT EDUCATION$10,000
FALL CREEK AREA FOUNDATION$10,000
DALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS AT DALLAS FOUNDATION$10,000
UW EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DALLAS FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$646k · 13 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$646k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+41%

Still filing today

69%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SCHOLARSHOT
    6× · 2019–2025 · $72k · revenue +48%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK
    4× · 2018–2023 · $65k · revenue +80%
  • TE
    THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +97%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY DALLAS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Family Assistance Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
4
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
5
Fort Worth Country Day School Inc

The mission of fort worth country day school is to foster the intellectual, physical, emotional and ethical development of capable students through an academically rigorous college preparatory program that integrates the arts and athletics.

Education
6
Dallas Baptist University

The purpose of dallas baptist university is to provide christ-centered quality higher education in the arts, sciences, and professional studies at both the undergraduate and graduate levels to traditional age and adult students in order to…

Education
7
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
8
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
The Episcopal School of Dallas Permanent Endowment Trust

The episcopal school of dallas permanent endowment trust operates exclusively as an endowment fund for the benefit of and to support the episcopal school of dallas, inc.

—
11
The Cambridge School of Dallas

The Cambridge School of Dallas was formed in 2001 and is a college preparatory, non-denominational christian school established for the purpose of providing academic excellence in a christ-centered environment.

Education
12
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rise Together Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLSCHOLARSHOT: $72,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHOTTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $50,000 · OtherTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INCLEGACY SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $48,000 · OtherLEGACY SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER DALLAS: $40,900 · OtherTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER DALLASUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS AT DALLAS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS AT DALLAS FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK: $65,000 · EducationYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWOR…TRINITY SCHOOL OF DURHAM AND CHAPEL HILL INC: $50,000 · EducationTRINITY SCHOOL OF DURHAM AND CHA…UPLIFT EDUCATION: $30,000 · EducationUPLIFT EDUCATIONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CL…RISE TOGETHER EDUCATION INC: $30,000 · EducationRISE TOGETHER EDUCATION INCDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCFALL CREEK AREA FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Community ImprovementFALL CREEK AR…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRonald McDonald House of Dallas Family Assistance Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$400,900Education$225,000Community Improvement$90,000Youth Development$40,000Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFALL CREEK AREA FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetSCHOLARSHOT: $72,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK: $65,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL OF DURHAM AND CHAPEL HILL INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRISE TOGETHER EDUCATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRonald McDonald House of Dallas Family Assistance Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FALL CREEK AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHOT ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL OF DURHAM AND CHAPEL HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RISE TOGETHER EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Family Assistance Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M&T Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M&T Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to M&T Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to M&T Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on M&T’s filings →

    More from the funding graph