Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
25%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$12,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 6
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$441k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 25% of the organizations Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 37% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$75k33%
FY20244$67k25%
FY20236$52k33%
FY20225$46k40%
FY20216$49k50%
FY20204$54kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$190kArts & Culture$78kHuman Services$20kReligion$13kCommunity Improvement$11kHealth$10kEducation$10kEnvironment$8kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Citizens For Animal Protection Inc$150,00061%
The Houston Audubon Society$40,00021%
Da Camera Society of Texas$37,00040%
Bravo Colorado at Beaver Creek-Vail Inc Dba Bravo Vail Valley Music Festival$28,00050%
Healthcare for the Homeless-Houston$20,00010%
Dbt Center Training Institute$10,0001n/a
William Marsh Rice University$10,00010%
Christ Church Cathedral$7,5002n/a
Hermann Park Conservancy$7,00020%
Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston$5,00010%

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($26k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $150,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetThe Houston Audubon Society: $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDa Camera Society of Texas: $37,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBravo Colorado at Beaver Creek-Vail Inc Dba Bravo Vail Valley Music Festival: $28,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHealthcare for the Homeless-Houston: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHermann Park Conservancy: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Baker Hughes Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation with peer funders

About Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation

How much does Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation give?
Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $74,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 6 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (56%), Arts & Culture (23%), Human Services (6%).
Who are Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Citizens For Animal Protection Inc ($150k), The Houston Audubon Society ($40k), Da Camera Society of Texas ($37k).
Does Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Greater Houston Community Foundation, Shell USA Company Foundation, Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation.
Where is Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation based?
Lynne Murray Sr Educational Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lynne Murray Sr Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph