Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lusk Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$47kHuman Services$32kReligion$28kArts & Culture$23kHealth$17kYouth Development$5kEnvironment$4kEmployment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$433k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,438
WICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER$2,000
FOUNDATION FOR ANDOVER SCHOOLS$2,000
THE TREEHOUSE$2,000
KMUW$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
BLUE SKY RANCH$2,000
FRIENDS OF ANDOVER PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,000
SIMPLY HYGIENE$1,938
WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME$1,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,500
EAST HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
WICHITA'S LITTLEST HEROS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE TREEHOUSE: $2k → 16%WICHITA'S LITTLEST HEROS: $1k → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $1k → 16%BRIDGET'S CRADLES FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%BRIDGET'S CRADLES FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%BRIDGET'S CRADLES FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%THE PANDO INITIATIVE: $5k → 16%THE PANDO INITIATIVE: $4k → 16%THE PANDO INITIATIVE: $2k → 16%THE PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 16%WICHITA'S LITTLEST HEROS: $626 → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 16%WICHITA'S LITTLEST HEROS: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 16%WICHITA'S LITTLEST HEROS: $500 → 16%SIMPLY HYGIENE: $8k → 16%SIMPLY HYGIENE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 25 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
9

Total granted

$152k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+84%

Still filing today

56%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PANDO INITIATIVE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +42%
  • WA
    WICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +49%
  • GT
    GIVING THE BASICS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • PF
    PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +179%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK CTY
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Texas Parent & Child Development Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing quality, comprehensive services to pregnant women, infants, and toddlers. teaming with other agencies enables them to help each child and family achieve social competency. early head start…

—
2
Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies

Out vision is: all communities across kansas value and support a high-quality early childhood care and education system.

Environment
3
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
4
Winnetka Public School Nursery

Preschool serving children ages 2 to 6

Education
5
Wichita Montessori School Inc

We seek to provide a superior educational experience for children ages 3 to 11, utilizing the montessori methods of teaching and learning. we address the intellectual, emotional, physical and social growth of each child.

—
6
Kansas Children's Foundation

The kansas children's foundation is dedicated to providing resources including financial and emotional support to children and families across the state of kansas.

Health
7
Kansas National Education Association

To advocate for education professionals and to unite our members, kansans, and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

—
8
Whole Child Collaborative

To provide a holistic, multidisciplinary education to learners of all abilities

Education
9
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
10
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
11
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
12
Kansas Action for Children Inc

Kansas action for children, inc. is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to shaping health, education and economic policy that improves the lives of kansas children and their families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichitas Littlest Heroes; the most unlike its peers is Bridgets Cradles Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15,535 · OtherEASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $10,196 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $8,250 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEKU ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · OtherKU ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONEAST HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherEAST HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST: $5,750 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD IN CHRISTGIVING THE BASICS INC: $5,281 · OtherGIVING THE BASICS INCROLPH LITERACY ACADEMY: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · Other+12 more: $16,000 · Other+12 moreTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE PANDO INITIATIVE I…SIMPLY HYGIENE INC: $9,938 · Human ServicesSIMPLY HYGIENE INCTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $3,723 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S…THE TREEHOUSE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE INCWICHITAS LITTLEST HEROES: $2,626 · Human ServicesWICHITAS LITTLEST HERO…BRIDGETS CRADLES FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Human ServicesWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationWICHITA PUBLI…THE FOUNDATION FOR ANDOVER SCHOOLS: $7,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATIO…PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $2,500 · EducationPHILLIPS FUND…ARTS PARTNERS INC: $820 · EducationWICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC: $5,500 · HealthEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWICHITA CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureRISE UP FOR YOUTH INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOTANICA INC: $500 · Environment
Other$98,512Human Services$32,787Education$20,320Health$5,500Arts & Culture$5,000Youth Development$3,500Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSIMPLY HYGIENE INC: $9,938 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR ANDOVER SCHOOLS: $7,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetWICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC: $5,281 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $3,723 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRISE UP FOR YOUTH INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWICHITAS LITTLEST HEROES: $2,626 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWICHITA CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGETS CRADLES FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVICTORY IN THE VALLEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTS PARTNERS INC: $820 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOTANICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PANDO INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMPLY HYGIENE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR ANDOVER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds RISE UP FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TREEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITAS LITTLEST HEROES ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SKY RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGETS CRADLES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY IN THE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Foundation IncKS32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Wichita Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Servant Foundation · Beach Family Foundation Inc · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Ima Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation · Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lusk Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lusk Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lusk Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lusk Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lusk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph