Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lulu Bryan Rambaud Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$423kHousing & Shelter$246kHealth$180kFood & Nutrition$70kPublic Benefit$50kYouth Development$15k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $116k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northwest Assistance Ministries$30,000
Interfaith Ministries$20,000
Lord of the Streets$20,000
Wesley Community Center$15,000
El Centro de Corazon$11,000
Houston Food Bank$10,000
Avenue 360 Health and Wellness$10,000
North Pasadena Community Outreach$5,000
The Beacon$5,000
Mission of Yahweh$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $333k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Wesley Community Center: $15k → 16%Wesley Community Center: $15k → 16%WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $12k → 16%WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $12k → 16%Wesley Community Center: $10k → 16%WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 16%Wesley Community Center: $10k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministries: $30k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministries: $30k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministries: $30k → 16%Northwest Assistance Ministries: $30k → 16%Have Shears Will Travel: $10k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $30k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $30k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$964k · 14 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$964k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+25%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON
    8× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +73%
  • EC
    EL CENTRO DE CORAZON
    8× · 2018–2025 · $93k · revenue +24%
  • WC
    WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC OF HOUSTON TEXAS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $83k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • HS
    HAVE SHEARS WILL TRAVEL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -40%
  • TC
    The Council on Recoverygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Area Community Development Corporation

Houston Area Development Corporation (HACDC), a Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDO), owns and operates single room occupancy (SRO) properties housing low-income individuals and the chronically homeless. It offers robust…

Human Services
2
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
3
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
4
West Street Recovery

West Street Recovery's mission is to connect communities to the resources they need to rebuild after climate disasters such as Hurricane Harvey and build resilient, secure, and stronger communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
South Central Houston Action Council Inc

The organization provides medical services in the form of primary and preventive care to underserved and underinsured residents of harris county.

—
6
Coalition for the Homeless of Houston Harris County

The coalition for the homeless of houston/harris county acts as a catalyst, uniting partners and maximizing resources to move people experiencing homelessness into permanent housing with supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
7
Main Street Ministries Houston

Main Street Ministries (MSM) is on a mission to build paths out of poverty empowered by the love of Jesus.

Human Services
8
Spring Branch Community Health Center

To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.

Health
9
Houston Area Women's Center

The Houston Area Women's Center (HAWC) works to end domestic and sexual violence and supports all in building safe and healthy lives through advocacy, counseling, education, shelter, and support services.

Human Services
10
Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.

Health
11
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
12
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Area Community Services; the most unlike its peers is North Pasadena Community Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lord of the Streets: $125,000 · OtherLord of the StreetsInterfaith Ministries: $65,000 · OtherInterfaith MinistriesHOUSTON COMPASS INC: $50,000 · OtherHOUSTON COMPASS INCAMAZING PLACE: $40,000 · OtherAMAZING PLACEHOUSTON EYE ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $31,000 · OtherHOUSTON EYE ASSOCIATION FOUNDATIONMISSION OF YAHWEH INC: $30,000 · OtherMISSION OF YAHWEH INCThe Houston Food Bank: $25,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $240,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIESWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC OF HOUSTON TEXAS: $83,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC OF HOUSTON…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $107,000 · HealthTHE BEACON OF DOW…HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $36,000 · HealthHOUSTON AREA COMM…The Council on Recovery: $10,000 · HealthThe Council on Re…EL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $93,000 · Crime & LegalEL CENTRO …New Hope Housing Inc: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTH PASADENA COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$366,000Human Services$333,000Health$153,000Crime & Legal$93,000Housing & Shelter$24,000Youth Development$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $240,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $107,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetEL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $93,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC OF HOUSTON TEXAS: $83,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION OF YAHWEH INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hope Housing Inc: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH PASADENA COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHAVE SHEARS WILL TRAVEL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Council on Recovery: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE CORAZON ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC OF HOUSTON TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF YAHWEH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PASADENA COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds HAVE SHEARS WILL TRAVEL ↗
  • Who funds The Council on Recovery ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX22.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Medallion Foundation Inc · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · United Way of Greater Houston · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Simmons Foundation · Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services · Episcopal Health Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund · Houston Endowment Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Coalition for the Homeless of Houston Harris County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lulu Bryan Rambaud Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lulu Bryan Rambaud Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lulu Bryan Rambaud’s filings →

    More from the funding graph