· Private foundation
Luethge Irene I Charitable Tuw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC | $6,000 |
| RIDGES SANCTUARY INC | $6,000 |
| EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC | $6,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $6,000 |
| SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $6,000 |
| LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| THE CLEARING | $6,000 |
| SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $6,000 |
| NEW HOLSTEIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC | $6,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL PARK TRUST OF | $6,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue +138%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue +30%
- LHLAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue +551%
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Humane treatment of animals
To provide services for abandoned, stray or unwanted animals while they await life long homes. our vision is that all animals are cared for with dignity and respect.
Humane treatement of animals
Protect/preserve animals and their rights
The mission of wvhs is to serve the community through education, protection and pet adoptions. we continue our mission by taking care of displaced pets, rescuing injured and lost animals, providing spay/neuter programs, investigating…
Oconto area humane society is an open-admission shelter dedicated to providing protection, care and shelter for abandoned and homeless campanion animals
The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.
The organization values the human/animal bond, provides stewardship for homeless pets and promotoes compassionate treatment of all companion animals.
To maintain a humane society
Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.
The huntington county humane society exists to protect and provide shelter for animals and to encourage the humane treatment of all animals in huntington county.
The jay county humane society is a limited admissions shelter committed to finding good homes for stray, abandoned, mis-treated and unwanted animals.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEARING ↗
- Who funds EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL PARK TRUST OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Luethge Irene I Charitable Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Luethge Irene I Charitable Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Luethge Irene I Charitable Tuw’s filings →