Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Luethge Irene I Charitable Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$145kAnimals$145kEnvironment$133kEducation$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HOLSTEIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC$6,000
RIDGES SANCTUARY INC$6,000
SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$6,000
LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC$6,000
SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$6,000
THE CLEARING$6,000
ENVIRONMENTAL PARK TRUST OF$6,000
EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC$6,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$6,000
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 6%LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 7%RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 7%EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 6%LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 7%RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 7%EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 6%LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 7%RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 7%EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 6%LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 7%RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 7%EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 6%LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 7%RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 7%EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 6%LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 7%RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 7%EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 6%LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 7%RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 9%NEW HOLSTEIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $6k → 6%THE CLEARING: $6k → 8%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6k → 9%NEW HOLSTEIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $6k → 6%THE CLEARING: $6k → 8%MAYWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL PARK: $6k → 9%SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6k → 9%MAYWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL PARK: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$434k · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$434k
$0

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue +138%
  • SC
    SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue +36%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue +30%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Humane Society of Shenandoah County Virginia Inc

    Humane treatment of animals

    Animals
    2
    Humane Society of the Lakes

    To provide services for abandoned, stray or unwanted animals while they await life long homes. our vision is that all animals are cared for with dignity and respect.

    Animals
    3
    Missaukee Humane Society

    Humane treatement of animals

    Animals
    4
    Tuscarawas County Humane Society

    Protect/preserve animals and their rights

    Animals
    5
    Wenatchee Valley Humane Society Inc

    The mission of wvhs is to serve the community through education, protection and pet adoptions. we continue our mission by taking care of displaced pets, rescuing injured and lost animals, providing spay/neuter programs, investigating…

    Animals
    6
    Oconto Area Humane Society & Animal Shelter Inc

    Oconto area humane society is an open-admission shelter dedicated to providing protection, care and shelter for abandoned and homeless campanion animals

    Animals
    7
    Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

    The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

    Animals
    8
    Whitman County Humane Society

    The organization values the human/animal bond, provides stewardship for homeless pets and promotoes compassionate treatment of all companion animals.

    Animals
    9
    Northwoods Animal Shelter

    To maintain a humane society

    Animals
    10
    Dodge County Humane Society Inc

    Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.

    Animals
    11
    Huntington County Humane Society Inc

    The huntington county humane society exists to protect and provide shelter for animals and to encourage the humane treatment of all animals in huntington county.

    Animals
    12
    Jay County Humane Society Inc

    The jay county humane society is a limited admissions shelter committed to finding good homes for stray, abandoned, mis-treated and unwanted animals.

    Animals

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Sheboygan County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    NEW HOLSTEIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $48,250 · OtherNEW HOLSTEIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $48,250 · OtherSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYLAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $48,250 · OtherLAWRENCE UNIVERSITYTHE CLEARING — $48,250 · OtherTHE CLEARINGTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $48,250 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYENVIRONMENTAL PARK TRUST OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY — $36,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL PARK TRUST OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTYIndividual grant recipient — $12,250 · OtherTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC — $48,250 · AnimalsTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INCHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $48,250 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INCLAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $48,250 · AnimalsLAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INCEASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $48,250 · AnimalsEASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC
    Other$289,500Animals$193,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC — $48,250 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $48,250 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $48,250 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $48,250 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CLEARING — $48,250 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetEASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $48,250 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $48,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL PARK TRUST OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY — $36,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC
    • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
    • Who funds LAKESHORE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    • Who funds THE CLEARING
    • Who funds EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC
    • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
    • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL PARK TRUST OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Luethge Irene I Charitable Tuw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph