Skip to content

· Private foundation

Luberski Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$2.5MHuman Services$1.3MEducation$854kEmployment$555kHousing & Shelter$509kInternational$506kYouth Development$331kArts & Culture$291kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $649k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $712k
$19,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH AND FAMILY LIFE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES$150,000
SAN ANTONIO CATHOLIC CHURCH$103,500
FRANSISCAN MISSION OUTREACH$100,000
NAVAJYOTHI PROVINCE IDUKKI$78,349
C WINN$65,000
SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL$64,888
Individual grant recipient$50,000
JOSEPH OF CUPERTINO CLASSICAL ACADEMY$50,000
ST CATHERINE'S ACADEMY$50,000
SAINT MATTHEW'S PARISH SERIES 535 LLC$46,000
MATER DEI MONARCH FOUNDATION$45,000
Individual grant recipient$43,918
ASSOCIATION COEUR D'AMOURE$40,000
HIGHER GROUND YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$40,000
TG PROPERTY AND RENTAL MANAGEMENT$39,314
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEXTUP RVA: $413 → 9%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $36k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $33k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 68 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
77

Total granted

$5.7M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+8%

Still filing today

34%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $279k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +24%
  • HG
    HIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $330k · revenue +115%
  • NW
    NEW WAYS TO WORK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $320k · revenue +219%

Funded once

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO DE PADUA CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $366k
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO DE PADUA CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • MS
    MISSION SANTA CLARA DE ASIS
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
2
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
3
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Children's Hospital of Orange County

To nurture, advance and protect the health and well-being of children.

Health
5
Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc

Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.

—
6
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
7
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
8
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
9
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
10
Mission Hospice & Home Care Inc

Delivering compassionate support and exceptional care in the home for individuals and communities, guiding them with choice and dignity to navigate significant care decisions.

Human Services
11
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
12
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is House of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
30/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO DE PADUA CHURCH: $366,300 · OtherSAN ANTONIO DE PADUA CHURCHNAVAJYOTHI PROVINCE IDUKKI: $343,166 · OtherNAVAJYOTHI PROVINCE IDUKKINEW WAYS TO WORK INC: $319,565 · OtherST CATHERINE'S ACADEMY: $300,000 · OtherFAITH AND FAMILY LIFE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES: $266,298 · Other+135 more: $4,429,251 · Other+135 moreFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $400,000 · InternationalGIVING CHILDREN HOPE: $55,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · International+3 more: $15,500 · InternationalHIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $330,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $572 · Youth DevelopmentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA: $200,000 · EmploymentCALIFORNIA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE INC: $150,000 · ReligionSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $15,000 · ReligionIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $125,900 · Human ServicesFlorence Crittenton Services of Orance County Inc: $30,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,413 · Human ServicesMATER DEI MONARCH FOUNDATION: $45,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyHealing Hands Foundation: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BLESSING CENTER INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyKRAUSE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$6,024,580International$495,500Youth Development$330,572Employment$200,000Religion$165,000Human Services$161,313Philanthropy$155,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $400,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $330,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetNEW WAYS TO WORK INC: $319,565 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE INC: $150,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $125,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANTIAGO RETREAT CENTER: $120,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $85,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LET IT BE FOUNDATION: $62,500 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetGIVING CHILDREN HOPE: $55,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJoseph of Cupertino Classical Academy Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW IMAGE EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $30,500 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFlorence Crittenton Services of Orance County Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealing Hands Foundation: $25,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTHE BLESSING CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetIKAIKA OHANA: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWORDNET INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetMIDWEST POULTRY CONSORTIUM: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNational History Day Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION OF HAWAII: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COVINA VALLEY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPFA STRONG FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOC OF OC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $4,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWalk Intuit Inc: $3,627 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMOLOKAI HOMESTEAD FARMERS ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Fire Services Assoc Inc: $650 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetISAIAH HOUSE INC: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTROOPATHON: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXTUP RVA: $413 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW WAYS TO WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SANTIAGO RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds THE LET IT BE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIVING CHILDREN HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA20.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · The Levecke Family Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Luberski Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Luberski Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • National History Day Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Luberski Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Luberski Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Luberski Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph