Skip to content
Lubbock Apartment Association Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Lubbock Apartment Association Inc

To educate, advocate, cultivate relationships and provide resources to strengthen our rental housing industry.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$24kFood & Nutrition$20kHealth$20kEducation$17kHousing & Shelter$15kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$10kCrime & Legal$7k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $15,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $17,300 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$626k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGH POINT VILLAGE$15,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $5k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 17%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

—
2
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
3
Lubbock Boys' & Girls' Club Inc

To enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Volunteer Center of Lubbock Inc

The volunteer center of lubbock inspires a more engaged community by helping people find their purpose and act on it.

Community Improvement
5
Junior League of Lubbock Inc

The junior league of lubbock is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
6
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
7
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
8
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Contract Services Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
9
Friends of the Lubbock Public Library Inc

To financially contribute to the lubbock library system and promoting its many programs.

—
10
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Lubbock Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
12
Lubbock Area United Way Inc

Giving people hope. working to address the root issues of the significant challenges facing our south plains communities to create lasting, positive change.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Literacy Lubbock; the most unlike its peers is High Point Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $20,100 · Human ServicesHIGH POINT VILLAGE INCTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $15,100 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCHEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Ch…BROADWAY FESTIVALS INC: $15,000 · OtherBROADWAY FESTIVALS INCLUBBOCK FIRE RESCUE BENEVOLENCE FUND: $14,000 · OtherLUBBOCK FIRE RESCUE BENEV…LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,200 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK MEALS ON …LITERACY LUBBOCK: $17,000 · EducationLITERACY LUBBOC…CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $6,500 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$55,200Other$29,000Food & Nutrition$20,200Education$17,000Crime & Legal$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $20,100 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLITERACY LUBBOCK: $17,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $15,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBROADWAY FESTIVALS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Diekemper Family Foun…Ch Foundation IncCommunity Foundation …Kuykendall FoundationWelborn-Payne Endowme…HDS FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Diekemper Family Foundation IncTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Kuykendall Foundation · Welborn-Payne Endowment Trust · HDS Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lubbock Apartment Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lubbock Apartment Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lubbock Apartment Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home