Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lu-Ben Cohen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MHealth$201kReligion$150kInternational$108kHuman Services$57kPhilanthropy$33kArts & Culture$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAFCO$8,300
THE WILLIE & CELIA TRUMP SYNAGOGUE$6,225
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$5,400
IMAGINATION PRODUCTIONS INC$5,000
ASPCA$500
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$250
ADRIANE ARSH CENTER$100
JFCS$100
HAR ZION TEMPLE$43
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $5k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
24

Total granted

$1.5M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+43%

Still filing today

53%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $450 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
InternationalReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +40%
  • OM
    OPENDOR MEDIA INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +108%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    6× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • AI
    Adi Israel Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +76%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
The Jerusalem Connection
—
6
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
7
Israel Emergency Alliance

Standwithus is an international, education organization dedicated to informing the public about israel & combating extremism & anti-semitism. we believe education is the road to peace. (see continuation on schedule o)

International
8
Aishel Hatzedek
International
9
Friends of Ir David Inc

To provide assistance to organizations in the old city of jerusalem and the ancient city of david.

International
10
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
11
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hadassah Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Kenneth a Horowitz Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $1,100,100 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $55,400 · InternationalAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $50,000 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalMT SINAI HOSPITAL MIAMI: $140,000 · OtherMT SINAI HOSPITAL MIA…Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…JAFCO: $46,370 · OtherJAFCOIndividual grant recipient: $29,819 · OtherIndividual grant reci…THE WILLIE AND CELIA TRUMP SYNAGOGUE INC: $15,020 · Other+20 more: $34,259 · Other+20 moreOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $85,000 · ReligionZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $24,200 · ReligionMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC: $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $72 · ReligionJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $7,800 · Human ServicesTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KENNETH A HOROWITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,800 · PhilanthropyTHE FALIC FAMILY PRIVATE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyNational Gallery of Art: $2,455 · Arts & CultureMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $60 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $900 · Animals
International$1,205,750Other$315,468Religion$119,272Human Services$7,800Philanthropy$4,800Arts & Culture$3,015Animals$2,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $1,100,100 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $85,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $55,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $24,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $7,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $2,455 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KENNETH A HOROWITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BALDWIN SCHOOL: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FALIC FAMILY PRIVATE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPassover League of Philadelphia: $72 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds Adi Israel Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds THE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KENNETH A HOROWITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BALDWIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE FALIC FAMILY PRIVATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Passover League of Philadelphia ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater PhiladelphiaPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lu-Ben Cohen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lu-Ben Cohen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lu-Ben Cohen Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lu-Ben Cohen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lu-Ben Cohen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph