Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$764k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$114k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.3MHealth$1.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$845kYouth Development$726kHuman Services$615kCrime & Legal$288kFood & Nutrition$244kCommunity Improvement$176kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $242k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $516k
$27,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$113,749
PICAYUNE SCHOOL DISTRICT$76,891
Individual grant recipient$73,000
SIGHT SAVERS AMERICA$70,000
MANNA MINISTRIES$64,590
COMMUNITY OF CHRISTIANS HELPING YOUTH$59,400
15TH CIRCUIT COURT INTERVENTION COURT ENHANCEMENT$57,877
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI$40,000
PEARL RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$31,007
PEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE$27,500
SPAYMART$25,000
BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES$24,742
MISSISSIPPI FEDERATION OF WOMEN'S CLUBS$21,639
POPLARVILLE ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS$18,181
SOUTHERN PEARL RIVER COUNTY BAK PAK INC$18,175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $563k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BROTHER'S KEEPER MINISTRIES: $32k → 18%BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES: $25k → 18%BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES: $23k → 18%BROTHER'S KEEPER MINISTRIES: $20k → 18%BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES: $20k → 18%BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES: $16k → 18%BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES: $13k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES: $65k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES: $57k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES: $43k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES INC: $38k → 18%SENIOR CENTER OF SOUTH PEARL RIVER COUNTY: $37k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES: $37k → 18%SENIOR CENTER OF SOUTH PEARL RIVER COUNTY: $35k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES: $31k → 18%EXODUS PROJECT 21: $18k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES: $15k → 18%SENIOR CENTER OF SOUTH PEARL RIVER COUNTY: $12k → 18%MANNA MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 18%EXODUS PROJECT 21: $8k → 18%SENIOR CENTER OF SOUTH PEARL RIVER COUNTY: $5k → 18%EXODUS PROJECT 21: $4k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 29 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$7.4M
$266k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+56%

Still filing today

48%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $480k · revenue +34%
  • BK
    Brothers Keeper Ministries
    7× · 2018–2025 · $150k · revenue +26% · 40% of their budget
  • JW
    JACOBS WELL MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $110k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Mississippi Healthpolicy
Health
2
Mississippi Podiatric Medical Association
Health
3
Panama City Rescue Mission Inc

To provide an environment where the compassion and love of Jesus Christ can empower people to overcome and prevent life's adversities.

—
4
Matthew 2535 Ministries

To alleviate hunger in st. charles parish by soliciting, collecting and packaging food for distribution through a network of agencies and programs.

Food & Nutrition
5
Revitalize Mississippi Inc
Community Improvement
6
St Andrews Episcopal Church Jackson
—
7
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Co
Philanthropy
8
Jackson Council on the Aging Inc

The primary function of the Jackson Council on the Aging, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for the parish's elderly and to provide services to the elderly as well as coordinate and monitor the services of other local agencies serving…

—
9
St Luke Food Pantry

The St. Luke Food Pantry is an IRS-recognized 501(c)3 nonprofit organization incorporated in the State of Mississippi. The organization is committed to continuing its long-standing history of providing food boxes to the eligible…

Food & Nutrition
10
Freedom Center

Christian based residential rehab program for men with drug addiction.

Health
11
Bayou Research Institute
Crime & Legal
12
Children's Refuge Ministries

Dedicated to the promotion and protection of the general health and well being of children in chickasaw county, ms and surrounding areas by providing food, clothing, and other support for children and families in need.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mb Swayze Educational Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Southern Pearl River County Bak Pak Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PICAYUNE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2,486,632 · OtherPICAYUNE SCHOOL DISTRICTPEARL RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: $802,618 · OtherPEARL RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $552,998 · OtherPEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $326,698 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEARL RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $272,643 · Other15TH CIRCUIT COURT INTERVENTION COURT ENHANCEMENT: $207,877 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI: $192,080 · Other+19 more: $863,209 · Other+19 moreCOMMUNITY OF CHRISTIANS HELPING YOU: $621,880 · EducationCOMMUNITY …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $37,910 · EducationUNIVERSITY…+1 more: $22,000 · EducationMANNA MINISTRIES INC: $294,544 · Human ServicesBrothers Keeper Ministries: $149,687 · Human ServicesSenior Center of South Pearl River County Inc: $89,073 · Human ServicesThe Exodus Project 21: $29,668 · Human ServicesSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $480,000 · HealthSpay-Mart Inc: $110,000 · AnimalsJACOBS WELL MINISTRIES INC: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterPOPLARVILLE ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS INC: $71,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,704,755Education$681,790Human Services$562,972Health$480,000Animals$110,000Housing & Shelter$110,000Recreation & Sports$71,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY OF CHRISTIANS HELPING YOU: $621,880 over 8y, 79% of budgetSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $480,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetMANNA MINISTRIES INC: $294,544 over 8y, 12% of budgetBrothers Keeper Ministries: $149,687 over 7y, 40% of budgetSpay-Mart Inc: $110,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetJACOBS WELL MINISTRIES INC: $110,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSenior Center of South Pearl River County Inc: $89,073 over 4y, 17% of budgetPOPLARVILLE ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS INC: $71,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetWilliam Carey University: $66,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $37,910 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Exodus Project 21: $29,668 over 3y, 54% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAND TRUST FOR THE MISSISSIPPI COASTAL PLAIN: $14,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMB SWAYZE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF CHRISTIANS HELPING YOU ↗
  • Who funds SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Brothers Keeper Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Spay-Mart Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS WELL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Senior Center of South Pearl River County Inc ↗
  • Who funds POPLARVILLE ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS INC ↗
  • Who funds William Carey University ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN PEARL RIVER COUNTY BAK PAK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Exodus Project 21 ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST FOR THE MISSISSIPPI COASTAL PLAIN ↗
  • Who funds Association For Retarded Citizens Pearl River ↗
  • Who funds MB SWAYZE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gulf Coast Community Foundation IncMS24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Mississippi Power Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lower Pearl River Valley’s filings →

More from the funding graph