How much did LOWER PEARL RIVER VALLEY FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of LOWER PEARL RIVER VALLEY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

hardsuccesstechnologyhealth

2020

geareducationiiiviifirevolunteerpicayune

2021

volunteereye carecollaborative learningchildren's eye

2022

hobyrecoveryinterventionearlychildren's

2023

equipmentrecoveryinterventionpurchaseearlylearning

2025

youthequipmentparkinterventionpurchasenicholsonchildren's

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $6k
$10k–50k10 grants · $242k
$50k–250k7 grants · $516k

$27,500

Median grant

States reached

$27M

Total assets

Largest grants

CITY OF PICAYUNE$113,749
PICAYUNE SCHOOL DISTRICT$76,891
OASIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$73,000
SIGHT SAVERS AMERICA$70,000
MANNA MINISTRIES$64,590
COMMUNITY OF CHRISTIANS HELPING YOUTH$59,400
15TH CIRCUIT COURT INTERVENTION COURT ENHANCEMENT$57,877
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI$40,000
PEARL RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$31,007
PEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE$27,500
SPAYMART$25,000
BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES$24,742
MISSISSIPPI FEDERATION OF WOMEN'S CLUBS$21,639
POPLARVILLE ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS$18,181
SOUTHERN PEARL RIVER COUNTY BAK PAK INC$18,175

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $471k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.7M · 25 repeat orgs$331k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.7M

$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+13%

Still filing today

40%

17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PR
PEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
7× · 2018–2025 · $430k · revenue +48%
SS
SIGHT SAVERS AMERICA
6× · 2018–2025 · $350k · revenue +39%
BK
BROTHERS' KEEPER MINISTRIES
6× · 2018–2025 · $136k · revenue +43% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

CO
CITY OF POPLARVILLE
one grant, 2023 · $100k
LC
LAMAR COUNTY SUPERVISORS
one grant, 2022 · $75k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Southern Mississippi

The mission of the alumni association is to benefit the university of southern mississippi, its students, and alumni through upholding traditions, sponsoring activities, events, and publications.

Education

Birmingham-Southern College

Birmingham-southern college prepares men and women for lives of significance. the college fosters intellectual and personal development through excellence in teaching and scholarship and by challenging students to engage their community…

—

Christian Brothers University

Christian brothers university is a private, catholic comprehensive university committed to preparing students of all faiths and backgrounds to excel in their professional and public lives by providing challenging educational opportunities…

Education

Baptist Memorial College of Health

Prepare health care professionals for practice in the community.

Education

Louisiana Christian University

Operation of baptist college campus

Education

Belhaven University

Belhaven university (belhaven) is a christian liberal arts university dedicated to excellence in christian higher education.

Education

Providence Christian College

The college provides a post-secondary liberal arts education from a historic Reformed Christian Perspective.

Education

Southwest Baptist University

Sbu provides undergraduate and graduate degrees & offers a variety of activities, amenities, & scholarships to prepare students to become servant leaders in a global society.

Education

Xavier University of Louisiana

The mission of the university is to contribute to the promotion of a more just and humane society by preparing its students to assume roles of leadership and service in a global society. this preparation takes place in a diverse learning…

Education

Southern Wesleyan University

Challenging students to be dedicated scholars and leaders who impact the world for Christ.

Education

Messiah University

Messiah university is a christian university of the liberal and applied arts and sciences, offering undergraduate and graduate level programs.

Education

Mid-South Christian College Inc

Mid-south christian college is an institution of biblical higher education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mb Swayze Educational Foundation and the most unlike its peers is William Carey University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

11/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,143,204Education$996,691Human Services$471,174Health$350,000Recreation & Sports$18,181Food & Nutrition$18,175

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gulf Coast Community Foundation IncMS15.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Mississippi Power Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LOWER PEARL RIVER VALLEY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COMMUNITY OF CHRISTIANS HELPING YOUTH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 640834938 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on COMMUNITY OF CHRISTIANS HELPING YOUTH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LOWER PEARL RIVER VALLEY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation?

More from the funding graph

LOWER PEARL RIVER VALLEY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lower Pearl River Valley Foundation?

More from the funding graph