Skip to content

· Community foundation

Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation

Support local worthwhile community projects with income from a permanent endowment fund on the flathead indian reservation and the surrounding area

$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$248kRecreation & Sports$92kEducation$20kArts & Culture$17kFood & Nutrition$16kHuman Services$10kHealth$9kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $82,196, the rows itemized in this filing. The $184,813 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $102,617 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$30,000
NINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$10,000
MISSION VALLEY AQUATICS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,446
POLSON YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION$8,000
POLSON FAIRGROUNDS$5,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAFE HARBOR: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$330k · 4 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$330k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+51%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    8× · 2017–2024 · $228k
  • MV
    MISSION VALLEY AQUATICS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue -23%
  • NM
    NINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAKE COUNTY LIBRARY DIST
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • P
    PYSA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Polson Flathead Lake Museum

Provide a safe place for artifacts that have ties to the early Flathead Valley Settlement days including Native American artifacts.

Arts & Culture
2
Flathead County Search and Rescue Association Inc

Search & rescue

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Lake Murray Volleyball Club

To train coach and educate atheltes

Recreation & Sports
4
Sartell Athletic Club Inc

League player fees and tournament fees

Recreation & Sports
5
Jordan Valley Owyhee Heritage Council

Historical museum

Arts & Culture
6
Mountain Lakes Chamber of Commerce

To promote harmony and stimulate county-wide economic growth. with a goal to improve the quality of life, enhance communications between workforce & education, we strive for a postitive partnership with all jackson county citizens.

—
7
Mount Dora Lawn Bowling Club Inc

recreation

—
8
Moose Pass Sportsmens Club

Community hall - non profit - promote community of moose pass alaska and the quality of living

—
9
Mineral County Pool in the Park

The mission of the mineral county pool in the park is to enhance physical and mental well-being and promote health, safety, and recreational opportunities for all by designing and obtaining funding to build a community pool.

Recreation & Sports
10
Missoula Figure Skating Club Inc

To provide facilities and instruction to figure skating club members.

Recreation & Sports
11
Glacier Aquatic Club

Teach swimming and sportsmanship.

Recreation & Sports
12
Sterling Country Club Inc

Golf Course

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Polson Fairgrounds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mission Valley Aquatics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $227,638 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $16,200 · OtherLAKE COUNTY LIBRARY DIST: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · Other+8 more: $67,988 · Other+8 moreMISSION VALLEY AQUATICS: $68,408 · Recreation & SportsMISSION VALLEY AQUAT…Mission Valley Mariners Inc Baseball Association: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMission Valley Marin…POLSON FAIRGROUNDS INC: $5,750 · Recreation & SportsPOLSON FAIRGROUNDS I…NINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA: $17,286 · Arts & CultureSAFE HARBOR INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesARLEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $8,000 · Community ImprovementPOLSON YOUTH SOCCER ASSOC INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY: $5,500 · Education
Other$338,826Recreation & Sports$84,158Arts & Culture$17,286Human Services$10,000Community Improvement$8,000Youth Development$8,000Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION VALLEY AQUATICS: $68,408 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetNINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA: $17,286 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMission Valley Mariners Inc Baseball Association: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetARLEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $8,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPOLSON YOUTH SOCCER ASSOC INC: $8,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetPOLSON FAIRGROUNDS INC: $5,750 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY: $5,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION VALLEY AQUATICS ↗
  • Who funds NINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds Mission Valley Mariners Inc Baseball Association ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ARLEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds POLSON YOUTH SOCCER ASSOC INC ↗
  • Who funds POLSON FAIRGROUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Headwaters Health Foundation of Western MontanaMT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lower Flathead Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph