Skip to content

Montana · Community foundation

Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation

Support local worthwhile community projects with income from a permanent endowment fund on the flathead indian reservation and the surrounding area

$185k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$82k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$30,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$3.0M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 29% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving7$82k57%
FY20236$69k50%
FY20226$81k67%
FY20215$68k80%
FY20203$60k67%
FY20192$31k0%
FY20182$31k0%
FY20173$51kn/a
82% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$248kRecreation & Sports$92kEducation$20kArts & Culture$17kFood & Nutrition$16kHuman Services$10kHealth$9kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mission Valley Aquatics$68,40862%
Ninepipes Museum of Early Montana$17,28623%
Mission Valley Mariners Inc Baseball Association$10,000119%
Safe Harbor Inc$10,00011%
Arlee Community Development Corporation$8,00013%
Polson Youth Soccer Assoc Inc$8,00018%
Hot Springs Food Pantry$6,0001n/a
Polson Fairgrounds Inc$5,75017%
Friends of the Library$5,50018%

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($333k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMission Valley Aquatics: $68,408 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetNinepipes Museum of Early Montana: $17,286 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMission Valley Mariners Inc Baseball Association: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSafe Harbor Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetArlee Community Development Corporation: $8,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPolson Youth Soccer Assoc Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetPolson Fairgrounds Inc: $5,750 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetFriends of the Library: $5,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Headwaters Health Foundation of Western MontanaMT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation with peer funders

About Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation

How much does Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation give?
Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation reported 7 itemized grants totaling $82,196, out of $184,813 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (52%), Recreation & Sports (20%), Education (4%).
Who are Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Mission Valley Aquatics ($68k), Ninepipes Museum of Early Montana ($17k), Mission Valley Mariners Inc Baseball Association ($10k).
Does Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana, Town Pump Charitable Foundation, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation based?
Lower Flathead Valley Community Foundation is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lower Flathead Valley’s filings →

More from the funding graph