Skip to content

· Public charity

Low Income Investment Fund

See schedule oour mission and vision: everyone should benefit from living in a community of opportunity, equity and well-being.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$71MEducation$20MEmployment$18MCommunity Improvement$14MPhilanthropy$11MHousing & Shelter$6.8MHealth$4.5MPublic Benefit$2.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 53 grants below total $12,085,857, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,164,523 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,078,666 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $353k
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $3.7M
  • $250k+9 grants · $8.0M
$103,985
Median grant
9
States reached
$787M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FELTON INSTITUTE$3,000,000
FRANDELJA ENRICHMENT CENTER INC$1,700,000
MY CONNECT COMMUNITY$750,000
CANOPY SOUTH$608,273
SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC$490,472
GROWING TOGETHER$458,273
NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT GROUP$423,866
BANANA FANA PRESCHOOL$300,000
GUIDRY'S EARLY EDUCATION CENTER$286,307
ONE FIFTY PARKER AVENUE SCHOOL$217,425
MARINER MONTESSORI LLC$200,000
GROWING TOGETHER PRESCHOOL AND DAYCARE LLC$200,000
BRINDA ENTERPRISES LLC - STAR MONTESSORI SCHOOL & DAYCARE$200,000
LARCA ENTERPRISE - THE WIGGLE ROOM CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$200,000
MOLO HOT LLC$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GROWING TOGETHER: $458k → 15%SE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $490k → 8%CHERRY HILL STRONG INC: $110k → 6%EPIPHANY CENTER: $2.8M → 10%EPIPHANY CENTER: $538k → 10%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES: $769k → 17%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES: $567k → 17%MY CONNECT COMMUNITY: $750k → 16%TIDES CENTER: $125k → 10%BARBARA CHAMBERS CHILDREN CENTER INC: $452k → 14%BARBARA CHAMBERS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $240k → 14%BARBARA CHAMBERS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $160k → 14%PACIFIC PRIMAY SCHOOL: $139k → 10%MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $1.5M → 10%FIRST ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1.0M → 14%SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES: $183k → 10%EDUCARE WASHINGTON DC: $253k → 14%Mission Child Care Consortium Inc: $800k → 10%CROSS CULTURAL FAMILY CENTER: $1.8M → 10%EDWARD C MAZIQUE PARENT CHILD CENTER INC: $193k → 14%CROSS CULTURAL FAMILY CENTER: $1.1M → 10%THE CROSS CULTURAL FAMILY CENTER: $260k → 10%Nihonmachi Little Friends: $200k → 10%JAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL: $122k → 10%PORTOLA FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $605k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SF (YMCA): $1.2M → 10%FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $234k → 10%FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $162k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SF (YMCA): $638k → 10%FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $115k → 10%MID VALLEY FAMILY YMCA - MID-VALLEY YMCA BRANCH: $150k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SF (YMCA): $125k → 10%CHINATOWN COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $169k → 10%UNITED PLANNING ORGANIZATION: $1.5M → 14%MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $1.5M → 10%HOME AWAY FROM HOME CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $180k → 14%MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $1.4M → 10%MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $1.0M → 10%MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $128k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SF (YMCA): $3.0M → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $125k → 10%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON: $360k → 14%KIDS' CORNER DAY CARE CENTER: $638k → 14%BROADCASTERS' CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $440k → 14%NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $905k → 14%TUCKER'S DAY CARE: $550k → 14%NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $237k → 14%GROWING SEEDS CDC: $516k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109M · 203 repeat orgs$37M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

203 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 189 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

203
831

Total granted

$109M
$32M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+19%

Still filing today

37%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WY
    WU YEE CHILDREN'S SERVICES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $9.0M · revenue +208%
  • FI
    Felton Institute
    5× · 2021–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +87%
  • MN
    Mission Neighborhood Centers Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +217%

Funded once

  • SO
    South of Market Child Care Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $1.3M · revenue +4%
  • GS
    GROWTH SPURTS CHILD LEARNING CENTER LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.2M
  • MC
    Mission Child Care Consortium Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $800k · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
2
Joyful Learning Edc

In 2001, Joyful Learning Educational Development Center (Joyful Learning EDC) was founded with a clear vision to provide accessible, high-quality childcare that meets the diverse needs of every child.

Education
3
Child Development Center
Human Services
4
Early Years Development Center Inc

Provide full time child care service for ages six months through five years of age, and after school child care services for children up to twelve years old.

Human Services
5
Fallbrook Child Development Center Inc

We provide quality early childhood education and day care for children ages one to five years. We strive to promote each childs intellectual, emotional, social, and physical development in preparation for kindergarten.

Human Services
6
Kiddie Kampus Cooperative Play School Inc

Kiddie Kampus is a cooperative, play-based preschool located in Alameda for children ages 2 years 9 months to 5 years old. We work together to create a nurturing, engaging preschool environment that prepares our children for kindergarten…

—
7
Childrens Garden Early Learning Center Inc

The Children's Garden Early Learning Center is designed to meet the early care and educational needs for children ages 6 weeks through their 8th birthday. Serving up to 70 children on a full or part time basis through Early Head Start,…

Human Services
8
Little Childrens Developmental Center

The LCDC is dedicated to providing safe, secure, stimulating and age-appropriate developmental activites to low-income and working families with children between the ages of two and five.

Education
9
Denton City-County Day School

Denton City County Day School provides quality, affordable childcareto families in Denton County. Our mission is to provide qualitypre-kindergarten education and loving care to children ages 2 through 5 years. Our vision is that all DCCDS…

Human Services
10
Trinity Child Development Center

The mission of Trinity CDC is to provide quality, affordable care and education to young children and their families within our economically and ethnically diverse neighborhood. We strive to provide stability and support to the children in…

Human Services
11
East Side Early Learning Center

The center provides quality care and education to children of working parents and is licensed to care for 44 children from ages 6 weeks to 5 years old.

Human Services
12
Kid Central

Our mission is to provide quality and safe childcare for the families in our community and provide our youngest learners with a positive start to their education journey.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Connections Centers; the most unlike its peers is Saessak Preschool. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

222 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 222 of the 1,078 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
212/222
Grantees still filing
147/222
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WU YEE CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $8,994,940 · OtherWU YEE CHILDREN'S SERVICESFelton Institute: $7,917,383 · OtherFelton InstituteKai Ming Inc: $4,036,877 · OtherKai Ming IncC5 Childrens School: $3,034,456 · OtherGood Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Francisco: $2,490,500 · OtherKIDS ARE PEOPLE TOO CDC: $2,447,027 · Other+120 more: $44,475,853 · Other+120 moreMission Neighborhood Centers Inc: $5,528,489 · Human ServicesMission Neighborhood Center…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $4,981,451 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC…Mount St Joseph-St Elizabeth: $3,466,396 · Human ServicesMount St Joseph-St Elizabet…CROSS CULTURAL FAMILY CENTER: $3,141,609 · Human ServicesCROSS CULTURAL FAMILY CENTE…UNITED PLANNING ORGANIZATION: $1,515,937 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES: $1,444,958 · Human ServicesFAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $1,224,874 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $1,198,378 · Human Services+26 more: $10,411,523 · Human Services+26 moreTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $2,621,508 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN F…The Chicago Community Trust: $2,620,450 · PhilanthropyThe Chica…CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,613,346 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNI…THE DENVER FOUNDATION: $1,929,268 · PhilanthropyTHE DENVE…UNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH: $1,210,677 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…Friends of St Francis Childcare Center Inc: $1,813,835 · EducationSouth of Market Child Care Inc: $1,314,381 · EducationCOMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH GROUP: $744,674 · EducationFACES SF: $620,172 · EducationBANANA FANA PRESCHOOL: $610,183 · EducationMission Kids: $502,773 · EducationRAINBOW CHILD LEARNING CENTER INC: $476,250 · EducationDISTRICT MONTESSORI: $300,000 · EducationTHE DAHLIA SCHOOL: $260,000 · EducationRENAISSANCE CULTURAL CENTER: $250,000 · Education+3 more: $362,167 · EducationTelegraph Hill Neighborhood Association: $1,558,900 · Community ImprovementFCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $637,629 · Community ImprovementSOUTHSIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $608,273 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $429,761 · Community ImprovementNORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $423,866 · Community ImprovementAMPLIFY GR: $360,103 · Community ImprovementIFF: $300,000 · Community ImprovementWEST COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $221,525 · Community ImprovementGENESIS LA ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATION: $200,000 · Community Improvement+4 more: $553,237 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $1,372,423 · Housing & ShelterOakland Community Land Trust: $784,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF RUTH: $473,250 · Housing & ShelterPRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $372,500 · Housing & ShelterEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterGROVE PARK RENEWAL INC: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterATLANTA LAND TRUST INC: $138,960 · Housing & ShelterFranDelJA Enrichment Center: $2,577,400 · Youth DevelopmentBOOKER T WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $680,150 · Youth Development
Other$73,397,036Human Services$32,913,615Philanthropy$10,995,249Education$7,254,435Community Improvement$5,293,294Housing & Shelter$3,741,133Youth Development$3,257,550

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWU YEE CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $8,994,940 over 8y, 8.9% of budgetFelton Institute: $7,917,383 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetMission Neighborhood Centers Inc: $5,528,489 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $4,981,451 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetKai Ming Inc: $4,036,877 over 9y, 17% of budgetMount St Joseph-St Elizabeth: $3,466,396 over 3y, 27% of budgetCROSS CULTURAL FAMILY CENTER: $3,141,609 over 4y, 12% of budgetC5 Childrens School: $3,034,456 over 3y, 55% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $2,621,508 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $2,620,450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,613,346 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFranDelJA Enrichment Center: $2,577,400 over 6y, 30% of budgetGood Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Francisco: $2,490,500 over 4y, 25% of budgetTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $1,929,268 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of St Francis Childcare Center Inc: $1,813,835 over 2y, 48% of budgetEaster Seals Serving DC MD VA Inc: $1,614,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTelegraph Hill Neighborhood Association: $1,558,900 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetUNITED PLANNING ORGANIZATION: $1,515,937 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES: $1,444,958 over 3y, 58% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $1,372,423 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSouth of Market Child Care Inc: $1,314,381 over 1y, 22% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $1,224,874 over 6y, 22% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH: $1,210,677 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetNATIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $1,198,378 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetGATARI CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1,149,283 over 3y, 44% of budgetHAPPY KIDS LEANING CENTER: $1,106,827 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFirst Rock Baptist Church Child Development Center: $1,084,374 over 2y, 49% of budgetBARBARA CHAMBERS CHILDREN CENTER: $963,634 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetSt Albans Early Childhood Center Inc: $891,871 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetMy Connect Community: $832,577 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetOakland Community Land Trust: $784,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetCOMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH GROUP: $744,674 over 4y, 14% of budgetBOOKER T WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $680,150 over 2y, 16% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA LAND TRUST: $670,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetKIDS CORNER DAYCARE CENTER: $665,191 over 2y, 36% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC: $658,871 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetGAP COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER: $653,980 over 3y, 19% of budgetFCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $637,629 over 2y, 12% of budgetFACES SF: $620,172 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetBANANA FANA PRESCHOOL: $610,183 over 3y, 14% of budgetSOUTHSIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $608,273 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTUCKERS DAY CARE CENTER: $575,390 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetBroadcasters Child Development Cent: $557,255 over 3y, 22% of budgetGROWING SEEDS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CTR: $541,768 over 3y, 49% of budgetMission Kids: $502,773 over 5y, 12% of budgetSE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $490,472 over 1y, 34% of budgetRAINBOW CHILD LEARNING CENTER INC: $476,250 over 3y, 82% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $473,250 over 4y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WU YEE CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Felton Institute ↗
  • Who funds Mission Neighborhood Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds Kai Ming Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mount St Joseph-St Elizabeth ↗
  • Who funds CROSS CULTURAL FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds C5 Childrens School ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FranDelJA Enrichment Center ↗
  • Who funds Good Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds THE DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Friends of St Francis Childcare Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Easter Seals Serving DC MD VA Inc ↗
  • Who funds Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Association ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PLANNING ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds South of Market Child Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GATARI CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY KIDS LEANING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds First Rock Baptist Church Child Development Center ↗
  • Who funds BARBARA CHAMBERS CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds St Albans Early Childhood Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds My Connect Community ↗
  • Who funds Mission Child Care Consortium Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Community Land Trust ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Mimi and Peter Haas FundCA39.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mimi and Peter Haas Fund · United Planning Organization · Ashbury Childrens Foundation · Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc · Briya Public Charter School · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · The Reinvestment Fund Inc · Bothin Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Mission Economic Development Agency · Purpose Built Communities Foundationinc · Los Angeles Universal Preschool

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Low Income Investment Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Low Income Investment Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Board of Child Care of the United Methodist Church Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Easter Seals Serving Dc Md Va Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Loan Fund Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Growing Together Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Preservation of Affordable Housing Inc: 3% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1078 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Low Income Investment’s filings →

More from the funding graph