Skip to content
Loviscky Ohana Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Loviscky Ohana Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$21kPhilanthropy$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kEducation$11kYouth Development$9kHealth$6kCrime & Legal$5kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$227k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK$3,000
SPOTLIGHT PA$3,000
THE FRED H CARLIN COMMUNITY VISION FOUNDATION$2,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,500
HOUSING TRANSITIONS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $10k → 16%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%YMCA OF CENTRE COUNTY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 8 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$59k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationCivil RightsHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +103%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +21%
  • IC
    INDEPENDENT CATHOLIC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • NA
    NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -19%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Country First Foundation

At country first foundation we pursue a path to educate the public on important civic and policy issues. country first foundation strives to support nonprofits that are working on proven solutions that empower local communities from the…

—
4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
9
The Minnesota Camp Fire Foundation

Ensure camp fire minnesota's strong future. with nature as the catalyst, camp fire minnesota energizes youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.

Youth Development
10
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
11
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
12
Moral Compass Federation Inc

Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Native American Rights Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $5,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESFRED H CARLIN COMMUNITY VISION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherFRED H CARLIN COMMUNITY VISION FOUNDATIONCENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $2,000 · OtherCHEF HUI MAUI RELIEF FUND: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherSCASD EDUCATION FUND: $2,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC: $2,000 · OtherFUND FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 · OtherJANA MARIE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherJANA MARIE FOUNDATIONBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $5,000 · OtherBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCEHOUSING TRANSITIONS INC: $5,000 · OtherHOUSING TRANSITIONS INCMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF THE STATE…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE COUNTY: $1,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $8,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $2,500 · InternationalAMNESTY INT…STATE COLLEGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · EducationSTATE COLLE…SPOTLIGHT PA: $3,000 · EducationSPOTLIGHT P…NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsNATIVE AM…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PR…NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyINDEPENDENT CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $6,500 · Religion
Other$38,500Human Services$20,000International$10,500Education$10,000Civil Rights$8,000Philanthropy$7,000Religion$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE COLLEGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJANA MARIE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING TRANSITIONS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centre Foundation IncFerguson Foundation I…Northwest Charitable …The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Centre Foundation IncPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centre Foundation Inc · Ferguson Foundation Inc · Northwest Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loviscky Ohana Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loviscky Ohana Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loviscky Ohana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home