Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Loviscky Ohana Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$21kPhilanthropy$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kEducation$11kYouth Development$9kHealth$6kCrime & Legal$5kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$227k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK$3,000
SPOTLIGHT PA$3,000
THE FRED H CARLIN COMMUNITY VISION FOUNDATION$2,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,500
HOUSING TRANSITIONS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $10k → 16%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%STATE COLLEGE FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%YMCA OF CENTRE COUNTY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
NC
DC
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$59k · 8 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$59k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationCivil RightsHousing & ShelterReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +103%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +21%
  • IC
    INDEPENDENT CATHOLIC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • NA
    NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -19%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Country First Foundation

At country first foundation we pursue a path to educate the public on important civic and policy issues. country first foundation strives to support nonprofits that are working on proven solutions that empower local communities from the…

4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
9
The Minnesota Camp Fire Foundation

Ensure camp fire minnesota's strong future. with nature as the catalyst, camp fire minnesota energizes youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.

Youth Development
10
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
11
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
12
Moral Compass Federation Inc

Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Native American Rights Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $5,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESFRED H CARLIN COMMUNITY VISION FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherFRED H CARLIN COMMUNITY VISION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherSCASD EDUCATION FUND — $2,000 · OtherCHEF HUI MAUI RELIEF FUND — $2,000 · OtherFUND FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,000 · OtherCENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY — $2,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC — $2,000 · OtherJANA MARIE FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherJANA MARIE FOUNDATIONHOUSING TRANSITIONS INC — $5,000 · OtherHOUSING TRANSITIONS INCBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $5,000 · OtherBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCEMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $2,000 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC — $19,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF THE STATE…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE COUNTY — $1,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $8,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $2,500 · InternationalAMNESTY INT…STATE COLLEGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · EducationSTATE COLLE…SPOTLIGHT PA — $3,000 · EducationSPOTLIGHT P…NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $5,000 · Civil RightsNATIVE AM…TREVOR PROJECT INC — $3,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PR…NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyINDEPENDENT CATHOLIC FOUNDATION — $6,500 · Religion
Other$38,500Human Services$20,000International$10,500Education$10,000Civil Rights$8,000Philanthropy$7,000Religion$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF THE STATE COLLEGE AREA INC — $19,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE COLLEGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT CATHOLIC FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJANA MARIE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHOUSING TRANSITIONS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centre Foundation IncPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centre Foundation Inc · Ferguson Foundation Inc · Northwest Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Loviscky Ohana Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph