Skip to content
Love 4 One Another Charities Dba Live4love Charities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Love 4 One Another Charities Dba Live4love Charities

Organization's mission or most significant activities helping people up and helping people out.

$110k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$110kYouth Development$23kFood & Nutrition$20kHuman Services$18kAnimals$10kRecreation & Sports$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $95,115, the rows itemized in this filing. The $109,617 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,502 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN DOOR STUDIO$10,000
BROWN BAG LADY$10,000
UJAMAA PLACE$10,000
A MOTHER'S LOVE INITIATIVE$10,000
PROJECT FEED THE KIDS$10,000
BEAUTY MARKS FOR GIRLS$10,000
TRUE AND FAITHFUL PET RESCUE$10,000
PURPLE PLAYGROUND$10,000
ELEVATE OAKLAND$10,000
TEAM RUBICON$5,115
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UJAMAA PLACE: $10k → 14%SABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 11%UJAMAA PLACE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Black Girls Cook

Black Girls Cook aims to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent Black girls through food security, culinary arts, urban farming, entrepreneurship, and STEM, emphasizing Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Mama Glow Foundation

The Foundation strives to improve maternal health outcomes in three primary ways. They are: Providing scholarships to aspiring doulas and midwives, Engaging in professional development pathways for our doulas, and Working with educational…

Human Services
3
Project Milk Mission

Project milk mission is at the forefront of a vital mission - reducing infant mortality rates by championing breastfeeding, with a special focus on supporting low-income african american mothers. through comprehensive services spanning the…

Food & Nutrition
4
One Happy Mama

One Happy Mama supports and uplifts young mothers through mentorship, community-building, wellness education, and family-centered programming that promotes maternal health, economic stability, and positive parenting.

Human Services
5
Pretty Passionate Hands Inc

Pretty Passionate Hands Inc. is a charitable organization dedicated to supporting teen parents and vulnerable youth through education, mentorship, and life-skills development. The organization provides parenting education, financial…

Community Improvement
6
Beauty of Afrikan Sisterhood
Health
7
Painting a Different Picture Foundation

Painting a different picture foundation is ending malnutrition in infants and children by creating sustainable equal employment opportunities for their prarents.

—
8
Mothers Tutoring Academy

Mothers Tutoring Academy (MTA) is a non-profit and an after-school tutoring institution founded on the tenets of the bylaws of the State of Minnesota. It's co-educational where both genders sit and study together and an inclusive school…

Education
9
Teach Reach Inspire Build Empower

TRIBE, Inc. empowers Black girls through culturally relevant education, leadership development, mentoring, and wellness programming. Our purpose is to increase access to affirming, community-rooted resources that support academic success,…

Youth Development
10
Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective

Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective is a free and charitable clinic and social safety net. Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective serves Black pregnant and parenting mamas, their babies and children through community-based, holistic…

Health
11
Black Mental Health & Wellness
Health
12
Mothers for Mothers Postpartum Justice Project

Mothers nbsp;for nbsp;postpartum nbsp;justice nbsp;is nbsp;a nbsp;grassroots nbsp;organization nbsp;in nbsp;oakland nbsp;that nbsp;shows nbsp;up nbsp;for nbsp;the nbsp;black nbsp;community nbsp;one nbsp;meal nbsp;at nbsp;a nbsp;time…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeremiah Program; the most unlike its peers is Purple Playground. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MINNEAPOLIS SCHOOL OF NEW MUSIC: $90,000 · OtherTHE MINNEAPOLIS SCHOOL OF NEW MUSICA Mothers Love Initiative: $10,000 · OtherA Mothers Love InitiativeOPEN DOOR STUDIO: $10,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR STUDIOTEAM RUBICON INC: $5,115 · OtherJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $5,000 · OtherBROWN BAG LADY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBROWN BAG L…PROJECT FEED THE KIDS INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT FEE…UJAMAA PLACE: $13,000 · Human ServicesUJAMAA PL…SABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesSABATHANI…Beauty Marks for Girls: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAKE THE WORLD BETTER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRUE & FAITHFUL PET RESCUE MISSION INC: $10,000 · Animals51OAKLAND: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsPURPLE PLAYGROUND: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$120,115Food & Nutrition$20,000Human Services$16,000Youth Development$13,000Animals$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUJAMAA PLACE: $13,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRUE & FAITHFUL PET RESCUE MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBROWN BAG LADY: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetA Mothers Love Initiative: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT FEED THE KIDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget51OAKLAND: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBeauty Marks for Girls: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $5,115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE THE WORLD BETTER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Love 4 One Another Charities Dba Live4love Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Love 4 One Another Charities Dba Live4love Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Love 4 One Another Charities Dba Live4love Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Love 4 One Another Charities Dba Live4love Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Love 4 One Another Charities Dba Live4love Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home