Loading…
· Public charity
LOUISIANA CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
Health, care, and education beyond extraordinary.
$1.4M
Granted FY2024
12
Grants
3
Communities
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Education$20MHealth$668kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$15kInternational$14kEmployment$13kOther$10M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
youthforceyoungstudentslsupotentialnursing
2024
registered nursingnursing professionadvocacysmallsbacancerrelevant
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $96k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
- XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA$750,000
- CRESCENT CITY CLASSIC FOUNDATION INC$325,896
- TOURO INFIRMARY$87,500
- CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$87,500
- AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$75,000
- JEDCO$25,000
- CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS$15,000
- JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS$13,500
- GREAT 100 NURSES FOUNDATION$12,750
- THE SPLIT SECOND FOUNDATION$10,000
- AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
- LOUISE MCGEHEE SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30M · 5 repeat orgs$647k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
1
Total granted
$30M
$150k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+56%
+59%
Still filing today
60%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $497k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesInternationalEmploymentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLSU FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $18M · revenue +56%
- LNLSUHSC NEW ORLEANS3× · 2019–2021 · $9.4M
- XUXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA2× · 2023–2024 · $1.5M · revenue -37%
Funded once
- YNYOUTHFORCE NOLAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Louisiana Christian University
Operation of baptist college campus
Education
2
Loyola University
Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…
Education
3
Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.
Health
4
Christus Health Central Louisiana
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in comformity with the roman catholic church.
Health
5
Lsu Research Foundation
Community Improvement
6
Ochsner Lsu Health System of North
To provide hospital and medical care to the residents of shreveport and monroe, louisiana, and their surrounding communities through the ownership and operation of three safety-net hospitals.
Health
7
Lourdes University
Lourdes university, rooted in catholic and franciscan traditions, provides a values-centered education that enriches lives and advances academic excellence.
Education
8
Saint Xavier University
Educate men and women to search for the truth, think critically, and communicate effectively.
Education
9
St Louis University
To seek excellence in teaching, research, health care, and service to the community as guided by the spiritual and intellectual ideals of the society of jesus.
Education
10
La Salle University
Provides a higher education in general and specialized studies
Education
11
Louisville Collegiate School
To operate a jk-12, co-educational independent school.
Education
12
Louisiana Sports Hall of Fame
To promote the sports history of louisiana and its many accomplished athletes through the establishment and maintenance of a central hall of fame and the preservation of sports history and memorabilia.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Archdiocese and the most unlike its peers is Xavier University of Louisiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$19,568,920Other$10,321,333Health$667,500Community Improvement$25,000Human Services$15,000International$13,500Employment$12,750
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds CRESCENT CITY CLASSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTHFORCE NOLA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JEDCO ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds GREAT 100 NURSES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SPLIT SECOND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LOUISE MCGEHEE SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Ochsner Clinic Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LOUISIANA CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CRESCENT CITY CLASSIC FOUNDATION INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 46.9× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 933600282 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CRESCENT CITY CLASSIC FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Louisiana Children's Medical Center?
Find your warmest path to Louisiana Children's Medical Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines