Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis M Dexter Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$92kHealth$72kHuman Services$32kArts & Culture$31kReligion$27kYouth Development$20kFood & Nutrition$18kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$590k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICCF FAMILY HAVEN$3,000
CALVIN COLLEGE$3,000
AQUINAS COLLEGE$3,000
ST CECILIA MUSIC CENTER$3,000
KIDS' FOOD BASKET$2,900
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN A$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION$2,500
GILDA'S CLUB WORLDWIDE$2,070
EQUEST CENTER FOR THERAPUTIC RIDING$2,000
COMPREHENSIVE THERAPY CEN$2,000
HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,500
ASSOC FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMP$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$301k · 21 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$301k
$2k

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CECILIA MUSIC CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +38%
  • CU
    CALVIN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +6%
  • HO
    Hospice of Michigan Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
2
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
5
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
6
Madonna University

The mission of madonna university, a catholic and franciscan institution of higher learning, is to instill in its students christain humanistic values, intellectual inquiry, a respect for university and a committment to serving others…

Education
7
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
8
Cleary University

To provide a business education that equips individuals to deliver superior service to employers and their communities.

Education
9
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

—
10
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aquinas College; the most unlike its peers is Mackenzie's Animal Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN A: $26,720 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN AIndividual grant recipient: $23,580 · OtherIndividual grant recipientICCF FAMILY HAVEN: $20,550 · OtherICCF FAMILY HAVENGILDA'S CLUB WORLDWIDE: $20,220 · OtherGILDA'S CLUB WORLDWIDEPORTER HILLS FOUNDATION: $11,600 · OtherPORTER HILLS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST MICHIGAN AVIATION ACADEMY: $6,080 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS AREA CHAMBER OF COMM: $4,680 · Other+3 more: $8,080 · Other+3 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,580 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGECALVIN UNIVERSITY: $25,530 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSITYAquinas College: $25,300 · EducationAquinas CollegeCOMPREHENSIVE THERAPY CENTER: $18,060 · HealthCOMPREHENSIVE…ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $13,400 · HealthASSOCIATION F…Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc: $9,000 · HealthEquest Center…ST CECILIA MUSIC CENTER: $26,400 · Arts & CultureST CECILIA…PROJECT ESME: $4,500 · Arts & CulturePROJECT ES…Hospice of Michigan Inc: $24,988 · Human ServicesKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $17,520 · Food & NutritionMACKENZIE'S ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $1,500 · Animals
Other$136,010Education$86,410Health$40,460Arts & Culture$30,900Human Services$24,988Food & Nutrition$17,520Animals$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,580 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST CECILIA MUSIC CENTER: $26,400 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $25,530 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAquinas College: $25,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $24,988 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE THERAPY CENTER: $18,060 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $17,520 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $13,400 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPORTER HILLS FOUNDATION: $11,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEquest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc: $9,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT ESME: $4,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetMACKENZIE'S ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST CECILIA MUSIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Aquinas College ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE THERAPY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ESME ↗
  • Who funds MACKENZIE'S ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Korff Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Frey Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis M Dexter Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis M Dexter Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Louis M Dexter Memorial Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Louis M Dexter Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis M Dexter Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph