Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis K Brandt Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2019
22
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Religion$51kEducation$26kHealth$10kArts & Culture$9kCrime & Legal$8kEnvironment$5kHousing & Shelter$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2019 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k21 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OXFORD UNIV METHODIST CHURCH$40,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CH-BEAUFORT$8,000
KID'S MEALS$5,000
RICE UNIVERSITY$4,800
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$4,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$4,000
LONES STAR FLIGHT MUSEUM$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$3,500
CHILD ADVOCATES INC$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MS FOUNDATION$2,000
CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
KELSEY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
STAR OF HOPE$2,000
THE ROSE$1,500
REGENTS SCHOOL$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KID'S MEALS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CO
VA
SC
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 11 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$42k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+69%

Still filing today

55%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    William Marsh Rice University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +104%
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCATES INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THACKER MOUNTAIN
    2× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • HW
    HOUSTON WILDERNESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +69%
  • PE
    PRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +42%
  • CD
    CASA DE ESPERANZA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
2
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
3
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
4
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Community Information Now

Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.

Community Improvement
7
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
8
Texas Heart Medical Group

To provide cutting-edge cardiac care to diagnose, treat, and prevent cardiovascular diseases.

Health
9
Central Houston Civic Improvement Inc

Central houston civic improvement lnc.'s mission is to ensure the continued vitality and to support development of downtown and the central city that is critical to the continued health and growth of houston.

Community Improvement
10
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
11
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
12
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The 100 Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OXFORD UNIV METHODIST CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherOXFORD UNIV METHODIST CHURCHFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CH-BEAUFORT: $8,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CH-BEAUFORTUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $4,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPITEACH FOR AMERICA: $4,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherCHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3,000 · Other+15 more: $19,850 · Other+15 moreWilliam Marsh Rice University: $10,050 · EducationWilliam Marsh…Baylor College of Medicine: $4,000 · EducationBaylor Colleg…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $1,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES I…KIDS' MEALS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesPRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalBRIDGES TO LIFE: $2,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $100 · Crime & LegalLone Star Flight Museum: $3,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THACKER MOUNTAIN: $2,000 · Arts & CultureA D Players: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSTON WILDERNESS INC: $4,000 · EnvironmentCoastal Prairie Conservancy: $1,000 · Environment
Other$83,650Education$15,050Human Services$8,000Crime & Legal$7,100Arts & Culture$7,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $10,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON WILDERNESS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLone Star Flight Museum: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THACKER MOUNTAIN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetINTERFAITH COMPASSION MINISTRY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKelsey Research Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA D Players: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCoastal Prairie Conservancy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON WILDERNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds Lone Star Flight Museum ↗
  • Who funds PRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THACKER MOUNTAIN ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COMPASSION MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Kelsey Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE ROSE ↗
  • Who funds A D Players ↗
  • Who funds Coastal Prairie Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Strake Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Robert and Janice McNair Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis K Brandt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis K Brandt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis K Brandt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph