Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis and Temple Marsch Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$123kHealth$4kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$890k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIUE$7,500
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$3,500
GREENVILLE COLLEGE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO-BOULDER$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$1,500
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$1,500
MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY$1,500
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$1,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$1,000
MISSOURI S&T$1,000
MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY$1,000
ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY$1,000
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST MAURICE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $200 → 19%MISSOURI S&T: $500 → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $200 → 10%SIUE: $3k → 12%BAPTIST CHURCH OF MORRISONVILE: $200 → 16%SIUE: $2k → 12%METHODIST CHURCH: $200 → 16%BAPTIST CHURCH OF MORRISONVILLE: $200 → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $200 → 16%ST MAURICE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IA
IN
CO
MO
TN
NC
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 29 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
11

Total granted

$121k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-1%

Still filing today

34%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Maryville University - St Louis
    3× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +10%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +12%
  • UU
    UNION UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S COLLEGE DEPT OF NURSING
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS COLLEGE OF NURSING
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • LC
    LEWIS & CLARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
5
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
8
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
9
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
10
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
11
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
12
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyola University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIUE: $18,500 · OtherSIUESOUTHERN IL UNIVERSITYEDWARDSVILLE: $10,500 · OtherSOUTHERN IL UNIVERSITYEDWARDSVILLEUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $8,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITYLINCOLN LAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6,000 · OtherLINCOLN LAND COMMUNITY COLLEGEMISSOURI UNIV OF SCIENCE AND TECH: $4,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $4,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · OtherMISSOURI S&T: $3,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO-BOULDER: $3,500 · Other+23 more: $29,700 · Other+23 moreMaryville University - St Louis: $7,500 · EducationMaryville University - St Lou…ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationILLINOIS COLLEGESOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY …UNION UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationUNION UNIVERSITYGreenville College: $3,500 · EducationGreenville CollegeMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationMILLIKIN UNIVERSITYUniversity of Miami: $3,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY+3 more: $2,000 · Education+3 more
Other$98,200Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreenville College: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St Louis: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Maryville University - St Louis ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Greenville College ↗
  • Who funds MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St Louis ↗
  • Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John R Lucash Scholarship TrustAL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John R Lucash Scholarship Trust · Lord Educational Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis and Temple Marsch Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis and Temple Marsch Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Louis and Temple Marsch’s filings →

More from the funding graph