Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Louis and Sandra Grotta Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$265kPhilanthropy$99kYouth Development$19kEducation$18kHealth$11kEnvironment$9kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$243k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$14,000
HARDING LAND TRUST$3,000
MUSEUM OF ARTS & DESIGN$2,500
KEMMERER LIBRARY$1,500
TOSHIKO TAKAEZU FOUNDATION$1,000
TEMPLE B'NAI JESHURUN$1,000
THE CENTER FOR ART IN WOOD$1,000
FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
AMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL$1,000
LONGHOUSE RESERVE$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$500
NAKAHIMA FOUNDATION$500
MRCC FOUNDATION INC$500
GREEN VILLAGE FIRE DEPT$500
NEW VERNON FIRE DEPT$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE SEEING EYE: $150 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
NE
VA
NM
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$407k · 22 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
25

Total granted

$407k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+32%

Still filing today

50%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    LONGHOUSE RESERVE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +5%
  • FF
    Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • HL
    HARDING LAND TRUST
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AJ
    Art Jewelry Forumgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +50%
  • L
    LONGHOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • TM
    THE MORRIS MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
3
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
4
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
5
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
6
Staten Island Institute of Arts and Sciences dba the Staten Island Museum

Founded in 1881 the Staten Island Museum engages visitors with interdisciplinary exhibitions, public programs, and educational activities for all ages. It is the mission of the Staten Island Museum to spark curiosity and generate…

Arts & Culture
7
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
8
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

9
The American Federation of Arts Inc

The american federation of arts initiates and organizes a national and international program of art exhibitions, publications, and educational activities to benefit the museum community and enrich the public's experience and understanding…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
11
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
12
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Morris Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Green Village Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsVeteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Health CentersCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%69%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM FUND — $200,150 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM FUNDJEWISH FEDERATION — $98,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONTHIRTEEN — $18,500 · Other+28 more — $34,344 · Other+28 moreMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN — $23,700 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF A…Art Jewelry Forum — $10,000 · Arts & CultureArt Jewelry…THE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM — $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ISAMU N…AMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL — $2,100 · Arts & CultureTOSHIKO TAKAEZU FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $1,950 · Arts & CultureLONGHOUSE RESERVE — $13,500 · EducationMRCC FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationFoundation for Morristown Medical Center — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthHARDING LAND TRUST — $8,100 · EnvironmentNEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION — $1,000 · Environment+2 more — $200 · EnvironmentAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC — $500 · InternationalTHE SEEING EYE INC — $150 · Human Services
Other$351,494Arts & Culture$42,250Education$16,500Health$10,200Environment$9,300International$500Human Services$150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN — $23,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLONGHOUSE RESERVE — $13,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetArt Jewelry Forum — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center — $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHARDING LAND TRUST — $8,100 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetThe Center for Art in Wood Inc — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL — $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMRCC FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTOSHIKO TAKAEZU FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGreen Village Fire Department — $1,950 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORRIS MUSEUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCFILE FOUNDATION co GARTH R CLARK — $150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL MUSEUM OF DINNERWARE DESIGN INC — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN
  • Who funds LONGHOUSE RESERVE
  • Who funds Art Jewelry Forum
  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
  • Who funds HARDING LAND TRUST
  • Who funds The Center for Art in Wood Inc
  • Who funds THE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM
  • Who funds AMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL
  • Who funds MRCC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TOSHIKO TAKAEZU FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Green Village Fire Department
  • Who funds THE MORRIS MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC
  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds CFILE FOUNDATION co GARTH R CLARK
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kronthal Family Foundation IncNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kronthal Family Foundation Inc · Fm Kirby Foundation Inc · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Louis and Sandra Grotta Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • The Morris Museum Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Louis and Sandra Grotta Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Louis and Sandra Grotta Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph