Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Louis & Melba Schott Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$144kHealth$110kYouth Development$90kHuman Services$80kEducation$40kInternational$35kHousing & Shelter$25kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPSPRING$25,000
CINCINNATI YOUTH COLLABORATIVE$25,000
CINCINNATI URBAN PROMISE$20,000
A CHILDS HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
THE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDU$10,000
GUIDING LIGHT FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOCUS ON YOUTH INC: $30k → 12%TALBERT HOUSE: $5k → 16%STEPPING STONES: $8k → 16%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $8k → 16%A CHILDS HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $25k → 16%A CHILDS HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$245k · 4 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
18

Total granted

$245k
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Clifton Cultural Arts Center
    4× · 2020–2023 · $133k · revenue +7%
  • CY
    Cincinnati Youth Collaborative
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • AC
    A Child's Hope International
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • FO
    FOCUS ON YOUTH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +8%
  • BC
    Breakthrough Cincinnati Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Ignites Cincinnati

Hope Ignites Cincinnati nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others through its holistic, long-term residential and academy programming. The organization provides direct…

2
Cincinnati Arts and Technology Center

Unlocking the self-worth and potential of at-risk teens through the transformative power of art, a first-class environment and a character-building culture. Equipping at-risk teens with skills, credentials and pathways to employment.…

3
Hope for Cleveland's Children
4
Every Child Succeeds

Every Child Succeeds is based on a strong scientific foundation demonstrating that a nurturing and stimulating environment in the first 1,000 days of life promotes optimal brain growth, cognitive development, psycho-social adjustment,…

Human Services
5
Wordplay Cincy

WordPlay Cincy sparks storytelling through creative expression and arts in healing with Cincinnatis young people to cultivate belonging, celebrate our strengths, and empower the community in its pursuit of social justice.

Education
6
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
7
ProKids

Advocates on behalf of abused and neglected Children. Mobilizing our community to break the vicious cycle of child abuse and neglect and provide outstanding advocacy for abused and neglected children who are in the juvenile court system.

Civil Rights
8
Fotofocus Cincinnati
Arts & Culture
9
The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati

The mission of The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati (TCT) is to educate, entertain and engage audiences of all ages through professional theatrical productions and arts education programming. Our vision is to awaken a lifelong love of…

Arts & Culture
10
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
11
Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Cincinnati

The mission of the YMCA of Greater Cincinnati is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. Counting members and program participants, the Y reaches more than 114,000 people…

Philanthropy
12
Cincinnati Aquatic Club

To offer children and young adults a top quality program that develops, trains and competes as competitive swimmers year-round in a supportive and motivating enviroment that respects, challenges and nurtures them as athletes, students, and…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Focus On Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Child's Hope International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Clifton Cultural Arts Center — $132,500 · Arts & CultureClifton Cultural Arts CenterCincinnati Playhouse in the Park — $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INCDOWN SYNDROME ASOC OF GREATER CINCY — $27,500 · OtherDOWN SYNDROME ASOC OF GREATER CIN…THE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDU — $10,000 · OtherTHE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC …GUIDING LIGHT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherGUIDING LIGHT FOUNDATIONRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES — $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESGREATER CINCINNATI BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $7,000 · OtherFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $10,000 · OtherFREESTORE FOODBANK INCCancer Family Care Inc — $10,000 · OtherCancer Family Care Inc+5 more — $25,000 · Other+5 moreA Child's Hope International — $35,000 · Human ServicesA Child's Hope Int…FOCUS ON YOUTH INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON YOUTH INCSTEPPING STONES INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES IN…BEECH ACRES — $7,500 · Human ServicesBEECH ACRESTALBERT HOUSE — $5,000 · Human ServicesTALBERT HOUSECincinnati Youth Collaborative — $50,000 · EducationCincinnati…Breakthrough Cincinnati Inc — $25,000 · Community ImprovementBreakthro…CINCINNATI URBAN PROMISE INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementCINCINNAT…UPSPRING — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentENVISION CHILDREN — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCINCINNATI GOLDEN GLOVES FOR YOUTH — $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$138,500Other$159,500Human Services$85,000Education$50,000Community Improvement$45,000Youth Development$30,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetClifton Cultural Arts Center — $132,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetA Child's Hope International — $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOCUS ON YOUTH INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBreakthrough Cincinnati Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUPSPRING — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCINCINNATI GOLDEN GLOVES FOR YOUTH — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCINCINNATI URBAN PROMISE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Family Care Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEECH ACRES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSH CARES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElementz — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetENVISION CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sutphin Family Foundation IcaPA34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Andrew Jergens Foundation · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Millstone Fund · Josephine S Russell Charitable · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Louis & Melba Schott Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph