Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lostand Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$324k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Philanthropy$250kHuman Services$40kCommunity Improvement$25kCrime & Legal$13kHousing & Shelter$3kArts & Culture$1kHealth$1kFood & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$867k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIVE AMERICANS IN PHILANTHROPY$250,000
JEWEL HEART$40,000
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS$25,000
CARING FOR THE HUNGRY & HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL$2,500
FORTUNE SOCIETY$2,500
PHILIPSTOWN BEHAVORIAL HEALTH HUB$1,000
GLYNWOOD CENTER INC$500
CONSTITUTION MARSH AUDUBON CTR & SANCTUARY$250
DESMOND FISH LIBRARY$250
GARRISON ARTS CENTER$250
HIGHLANDS CURRENT INC$250
GARRISON LANDING ASSOCIATION$250
WNYC RADIO$250
GARRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE CO$250
HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PHILIPSTOWN BEHAVORIAL HEALTH HUB: $1k → 6%HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC: $250 → 9%CARING FOR THE HUNGRY & HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL: $3k → 9%THE FORTUNE SOCIETY: $10k → 13%WNYC RADIO: $250 → 17%NATIVE AMERICANS IN PHILANTHROPY: $250k → 14%JEWEL HEART: $40k → 14%GLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $500 → 6%FORTUNE SOCIETY: $3k → 13%ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25k → 17%HIGHLANDS CURRENT INC: $250 → 6%DESMOND FISH LIBRARY: $250 → 17%CONSTITUTION MARSH AUDUBON CTR & SANCTUARY: $250 → 6%PHILIPSTOWN DEPOT THEATER: $250 → 6%GARRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE CO: $250 → 6%GARRISON LANDING ASSOCIATION: $250 → 6%GARRISON ARTS CENTER: $250 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Riverkeeper Inc

Protects and restores the hudson river from source to sea and safeguards drinking water supplies.

Environment
2
Wmht Educational Telecommunications Inc

Wmht enriches communities and elevates diverse perspectives by providing content, connection, and conversation that advance education, culture, and civic engagement.

—
3
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
4
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
5
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
6
Liberty Science Center

To inspire the next generation of scientists and engineers and excite learners of all ages about the power, promise, and pure fun of science and technology.lsc offers exceptional science learning onsite, offsite, and online as well as…

Arts & Culture
7
Garnet Health Doctors Pc

Delivery of primary care and numerous specialty medical care services to patients in the hudson valley of new york. our mission is to improve the health of our community.

Health
8
Gouverneur Hospital

Our mission is to provide skilled, compassionate, cost-effective care that promotes wellness and meets the community's healthcare needs.

Health
9
Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research Inc

The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).

Environment
10
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
11
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
12
Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc)

Community gardening, land conservation and environmental education are the primary activities. the community gardening program assists in development and maintenance of gardens with materials and neighborhood outreach. the land program…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hudson River Sloop Clearwater Inc; the most unlike its peers is Native Americans in Philanthropy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Native Americans in Philanthropy: $250,000 · Civil RightsNative Americans in PhilanthropyJEWEL HEART CORPORATION: $40,000 · OtherJEWEL HEART CORPORATIONENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 · OtherENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PA…CARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC: $2,500 · Other+5 more: $1,250 · OtherTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $12,500 · HealthPHILIPSTOWN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HUB INC: $1,000 · HealthHIGHLANDS CURRENT INC: $250 · Arts & CultureGARRISON ART CENTER INC: $250 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $250 · Arts & CultureGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $500 · Public BenefitHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC: $250 · Environment
Civil Rights$250,000Other$68,750Health$13,500Arts & Culture$750Public Benefit$500Environment$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNative Americans in Philanthropy: $250,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILIPSTOWN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDS CURRENT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARRISON ART CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARRISON'S LANDING ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lostand FoundationNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lostand Foundation · The D J McManus Foundation Inc · Lavori Sterling Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lostand Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lostand Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lostand Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lostand Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lostand’s filings →

    More from the funding graph