Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lostand Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$811k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$312k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Social Science$5.7MArts & Culture$3.1MInternational$2.6MEnvironment$1.5MEducation$509kHuman Services$261kHealth$249kReligion$190kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $324k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
  • $250k+1 grant · $312k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARRISON INSTITUTE$311,540
GARRISON INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL$70,411
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC$60,000
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATHISTORY$31,000
WORLD MONUMENTS FUND$30,000
JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER$25,000
HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL$25,000
SCENIC HUDSON INC$25,000
PROSOCIAL WORLD$25,000
BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC$25,000
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HUDSON VALLEY HOSP$25,000
Individual grant recipient$24,000
TIBET FUND$15,000
MAGAZZINO ITALIAN ART FOUNDATION$14,000
VILLAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($14M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($1.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAPITAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 9%MIND & LIFE INSTITUTE: $25k → 8%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%CAPITAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 9%CAPITAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 9%CAPITAL INSTITUTE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($1.9M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$1.0M · 1 grant
United Kingdom$389k · 8 grants
Bhutan$269k · 6 grants
Netherlands$202k · 3 grants
Thailand$1k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 134 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

134 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 103 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

134
90

Total granted

$14M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+17%

Still filing today

57%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationInternationalHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $650k · revenue +113%
  • TB
    The Bhutan Foundation
    6× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +141%
  • TF
    Tibet Fund Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • GI
    GARRISON INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $651k
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
Berggruen Institute
Education
3
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
4
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
7
Columbia University Press

Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…

Arts & Culture
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
10
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
11
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
12
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund for Public Housing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boscobel Restoration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

134 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 134 of the 233 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
134/134
Grantees still filing
85/134
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GARRISON INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL: $1,384,895 · OtherGARRISON INSTITUTE INTERNATIONALNATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA: $1,000,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADABROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $725,000 · OtherBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INCGARRISON INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE: $650,592 · OtherGARRISON INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTEDLA ART FOUNDATION: $440,000 · OtherDLA ART FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $365,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $238,000 · Other+111 more: $2,284,140 · Other+111 moreTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE: $6,029,049 · EducationTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE+14 more: $289,250 · EducationDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $650,000 · Arts & CultureDIA CENTER F…American Museum of Natural History: $221,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Mus…JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $177,500 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT LINC…HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $104,000 · Arts & CultureHUDSON VALLE…THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK O…STORM KING ART CENTER: $85,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $83,000 · Arts & Culture+26 more: $346,800 · Arts & Culture+26 moreTibet Fund Inc: $201,500 · InternationalTHE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC: $102,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $32,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $20,000 · International+7 more: $38,500 · InternationalScenic Hudson Inc: $187,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentHudson Highlands Land Trust Inc: $44,826 · EnvironmentMANITOGA INC: $26,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INC: $23,000 · Environment+9 more: $68,000 · EnvironmentENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $162,800 · Community Improvement+1 more: $2,500 · Community ImprovementTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $20,000 · HealthCenter for Therapeutic Riding of the East End Inc: $8,500 · Health+3 more: $3,750 · Health
Other$7,087,627Education$6,318,299Arts & Culture$1,767,300International$394,000Environment$393,826Community Improvement$165,300Health$112,250

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE: $6,029,049 over 9y, 27% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $725,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $650,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetThe Bhutan Foundation: $229,800 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $221,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTibet Fund Inc: $201,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $187,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $177,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $162,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $104,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC: $102,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTORM KING ART CENTER: $85,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $85,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $83,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Highlands Land Trust Inc: $44,826 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMAGAZZINO ITALIAN ART FOUNDATION: $44,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYesod Foundation: $43,905 over 6y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKARUNA-SHECHEN USA: $37,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCAPITAL INSTITUTE: $35,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetBRONX CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $35,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $32,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $28,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMANITOGA INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetGARRISON'S LANDING ASSOCIATION INC: $25,750 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMIND & LIFE INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNational Vote At Home Institute: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mustique Charitable Foundation: $18,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetORIGINAL MUSIC WORKSHOP INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPEACEJAM FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMANHATTAN STAR ACADEMY: $14,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $14,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLANK FORMS INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GARRISON INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Bhutan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds Tibet Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STORM KING ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Highlands Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAGAZZINO ITALIAN ART FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY27.9× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Lanegate Foundation · The D J McManus Foundation Inc · Ag Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · The Ford Foundation · Lostand Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Land Family Foundation · Putnam Arts Council · The Topfield Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lostand Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lostand Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Presencing Institute Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lostand Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lostand Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 233 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lostand’s filings →

More from the funding graph