Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lorraine F Petitfils Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$271kArts & Culture$72kHealth$49k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$827k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POMONA COLLEGE$17,000
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE$10,250
CAL TECH$10,000
KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$8,000
ABILITY FIRST$5,000
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY$1,500
GREATER PASADENA ALLIANCE FOR MEDIC$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ABILITY FIRST: $8k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $7k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $6k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $6k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $6k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $5k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $5k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $5k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$367k · 9 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$367k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • POMONA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +90%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +30%
  • CATE SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • WS
    WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OREGON
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • TC
    THE CHANDLER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
2
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
3
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
4
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
5
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
6
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
7
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
8
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
9
Maranatha High School

Maranatha high school is a christ-centered, evangelical college preparatory school that celebrates the whole student by equipping hearts and minds to reflect god's glory through academics, as well as the arts, athletics, and service. we…

Education
10
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
11
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
12
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westridge School for Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

POMONA COLLEGE — $122,000 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGETHE CALTECH Y — $113,700 · EducationTHE CALTECH YUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $23,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA+1 more — $6,500 · EducationTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $69,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN FILM IN…HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $3,000 · Arts & CultureABILITYFIRST — $49,150 · Human ServicesABILITYFIRSTUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY — $2,000 · OtherHUMANITAS ACADEMY OF ART AND TECHNOLOGY — $800 · OtherWESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $500 · OtherGREATER PASADENA ALLIANCE FOR MEDIC — $500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGON — $500 · OtherTHE CHANDLER SCHOOL — $500 · Other
Education$265,700Arts & Culture$72,000Human Services$49,150Other$4,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOMONA COLLEGE — $122,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALTECH Y — $113,700 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $69,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYFIRST — $49,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATE SCHOOL — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHANDLER SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE CALTECH Y
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
  • Who funds ABILITYFIRST
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds CATE SCHOOL
  • Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY
  • Who funds WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
  • Who funds THE CHANDLER SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lorraine F Petitfils Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph