Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lorraine and Leroy Campbell Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$595kReligion$265kYouth Development$143kHealth$125kAnimals$85kArts & Culture$53kCommunity Improvement$50kRecreation & Sports$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD CHURCH$90,000
FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN$50,000
KENSINGTON COMMUNITY CHURCH$45,000
LAKE LANSING BAPTIST CHURCH$40,000
FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN$30,000
DO ONLY GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $444k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $56k → 15%FRANKLIN AVENUE MISSION: $13k → 16%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $50k → 15%FRANKLIN AVENUE MISSION: $12k → 16%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $50k → 15%FRANKLIN AVENUE MISSION: $5k → 16%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $50k → 15%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $50k → 15%HOUSE OF HOPE MINISTRY: $23k → 8%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $44k → 15%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $40k → 15%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $20k → 15%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $20k → 15%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $10k → 15%WAVE PROJECT: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$814k · 5 repeat orgs$578k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +147% since the first grant, against +78% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$814k
$403k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+147%
+78%

Still filing today

40%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN
    6× · 2019–2024 · $470k · revenue +147% · 57% of their budget
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $125k · revenue +19%
  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $93k

Funded once

  • GRACE CENTERS OF HOPEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $68k · revenue +94%
  • LO
    LORD OD LORDS CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • CF
    CAMP FIRE SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rick Webb Ministries

To work with churches around michigan to honor god through collaborative services with food, games, live worship, biblical teaching, prayer, response time, and small groups.

—
2
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
3
About Face Detroit
—
4
Family of God in Christ Ministry

The family of god is a storefront ministry in the inner- city of detroit, michigan. it is a non-profit christian ministry committed to bringing hope to the hopeless by showing the compassion, that our savior, jesus christ has for all god's…

Religion
5
Youth With a Mission Detroit

YWAM Detroit exists to equip and send fully-surrendered followers of Jesus from Detroit into their missional calling. We work alongside youth and young adults in the community through training service and sharing their faith. Our goal is…

Religion
6
More Than a Bus

We are a 501(c)(3) non profit that serves the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of the hurting communiities throughout Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties where homelessness and hunger exist.

Human Services
7
Detroit Blight Busters Inc

Detroit blight busters, inc's mission is to stabilize, revitalize and rebuild detroit neighborhoods by demolishing, renovating and boarding up blighted homes for community use, building community partnerships and sponsoring events that…

Community Improvement
8
Lakeview Area Ministerial Association

To help feed those in need, help with rent, electricity, heat and other needs of the local community. Working together to serve others so they too can reach out to help those in need when they can get themselves to a better place.

Food & Nutrition
9
Movement West Michigan

Uniting christian faith leaders to serve with humility and love for the flourishing of all in our community.

Religion
10
Detroit Donates Inc
Housing & Shelter
11
The Pantry

To provide a food pantry in southeast kent county, michigan serving some of the most impoverished communities in southeast kent county. to provide holistic aid to our neighbors in need, supplying them with the food and personal care items…

Food & Nutrition
12
Next Step of West Michigan

A faith based organization employing people coming out of prison or rehab and providing them with a community of support that will help them integrate into the workforce, regain hope and empower themselves to create a better future.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wave Project; the most unlike its peers is Smile Train Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SMILE TRAIN INC: $125,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCYOUTH WITH A MISSION: $92,500 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSIONGOOD CHURCH: $90,000 · OtherGOOD CHURCHDO ONLY GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE: $85,000 · OtherDO ONLY GOOD ANIMAL RESCUEGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $68,000 · OtherGRACE CENTERS OF HOPELORD OD LORDS CHURCH: $50,217 · OtherLORD OD LORDS CHURCHCAMP FIRE SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $50,000 · OtherCAMP FIRE SOUTHEAST MICHIGANDRYDEN ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $45,000 · OtherDRYDEN ATHLETIC BOOSTERSKENSINGTON COMMUNITY CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherKENSINGTON COMMUNITY CHURCHQTMC INC: $41,000 · OtherLAKE LANSING BAPTIST CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherPILOTS FOR CHRIST: $40,000 · OtherNORTH END SOUP KITCHEN: $28,218 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherFAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $470,000 · Human ServicesFAITH WORKS MICHIGANFRANKLIN AVENUE MISSION INC: $29,500 · Human ServicesFRANKLIN AVENUE MISSION INCHOUSE OF HOPE MINISTRY INC: $22,500 · Human Services+1 more: $2,100 · Human ServicesLIFE REMODELED: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSouthgate Band Boosters: $12,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$804,935Human Services$524,100Housing & Shelter$50,000Arts & Culture$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $470,000 over 6y, 57% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $68,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP FIRE SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetFRANKLIN AVENUE MISSION INC: $29,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE MINISTRY INC: $22,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetSouthgate Band Boosters: $12,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWAVE PROJECT: $2,100 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds LIFE REMODELED ↗
  • Who funds DRYDEN ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN AVENUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Southgate Band Boosters ↗
  • Who funds WAVE PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lorraine and Leroy Campbell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lorraine and Leroy Campbell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lorraine and Leroy Campbell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lorraine and Leroy Campbell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lorraine and Leroy Campbell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph