· Private foundation
Lore Kann Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHOOT | $10,000 |
| ONE HEALTH | $5,000 |
| ASPEN | $2,500 |
| LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| FRIENDS OF YELLOWSTONE PUBLIC RADIO | $1,500 |
| MONTANA JEWISH PROJECT | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| ELMER TOTH FOOD PANTRY | $500 |
| WESTERN REGIONAL YOUTH ASSOCIATION | $450 |
| VIRGINIA'S HOME FOR PUBLIC MEDIA | $300 |
| VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS | $300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN | $300 |
| RICHMOND ANIMAL CARE & CONTROL | $250 |
| FRIENDS OF THE HENRICO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 4R4 RANGES REC CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $30k
- PCPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHOOT2× · 2024–2025 · $21k
- MJMontana Jewish Project3× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue -70%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $5k
- NPNorthern Plains Resource Council Foone grant, 2022 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
Promote research and actions to save wildlife.
Our mission is to provide visitors with an engaging, recreational, and educational experience, while ensuring exceptional care for our animal and plant collections and supporting responsible propagation programs for species in need.
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.
The mission of Blue Mountain Clinic is to provide individualized, choice-based healthcare that respects the power of personal connection.
PCEC works with our community to safeguard the land, water, wildlife, and people of Yellowstone's northern gateway through grassroots organizing and community advocacy.
To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.
Wildlife and natural ecosystems to safeguard biological diversity for current and future generations.
Uniting and mobilizing communities to keep montana wild.
BWP leads reliable and intentional conservation initiatives that promote and provide clean, ample water for people and habitats by working with key partners and our communities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bighorn Valley Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aspen-Abuse Support & Prevention Education Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Montana Jewish Project ↗
- Who funds BIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN-ABUSE SUPPORT & PREVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Livingston Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds Intermountain Planned Parenthood ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA POINTER RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Trap Free Montana Inc ↗
- Who funds MONTANA FREE PRESS ↗
- Who funds ABSAROKA BEARTOOTH WILDERNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIVINGSTON CENTER FOR ART AND CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds GREYHOUND FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Solid Rock Foundation Co Rosamond Stanton · Charlotte & Edward K Wheeler Foundation · Park County Community Foundation · Freeman Family Foundation · The Kendeda Fund · Montana Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lore Kann Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greenwich Arts Council Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.