· Private foundation
Looser-Flake Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $127k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $236k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERCER COUNTY BETTER TOGETHER | $75,000 |
| MERCER CSD #404 | $55,840 |
| MERCER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $55,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| SHERRARD CUSD #200 | $47,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,227 |
| CITY OF NEW BOSTON | $13,320 |
| MERCER CSD #404 | $11,662 |
| SHERRARD CUSD #200 | $10,196 |
| AUGUSTANA COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| MERCER CO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS | $10,000 |
| UNITED CUSD #304 | $10,000 |
| MERCER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $6,379 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,200 |
| CITY OF ALEDO | $5,126 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 8% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -26% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMERCER COUNTY BETTER TOGETHER5× · 2020–2024 · $333k · revenue +5% · 46% of their budget
- ACAUGUSTANA COLLEGE2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +21%
- QCQUAD CITY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- LFLIMITLESS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -26% · 32% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $18k
- VOVILLAGE OF NORTH HENDERSONone grant, 2022 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To further the tax exempt charitable works of the quad city symphony orchestra association.
Community activity center
Quad city arts is dedicated to enriching the quality of life in the qc region through the presentation, development and celebration of the arts.
The quad cities chamber of commerce is a combined chamber of commerce, economic, and community development organization serving the greater quad cities region. the quad cities chamber of commerce's mission is to strengthen and enhance the…
Promote arts in merced county
Support the oklahoma city community foundation through contributions to the allied arts foundation for funding arts programs that reach every county in oklahoma.
The purpose of the organization is to advance the general welfare and prosperity of scott county, iowa and the surrounding iowa quad cities area.
The promotion of altoona, ia
Commuity economic development and industrial development in adams county iowa.
Promote development of the quad cities by attracting, hosting, and supporting sporting events.
Support of the arts
To sustain and enrich our community through the arts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quad Cities Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mercer County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MERCER COUNTY BETTER TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LIMITLESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOLINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PROJECTS FOR ALEDO INC ↗
- Who funds ALEDO MAIN STREET INC NFP ↗
- Who funds MERCER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ALEDO CIVIC CENTER AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BALLET QUAD CITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Moline Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Looser-Flake Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Looser-Flake Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Looser-Flake Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.