· Private foundation
Loomis Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAMI Seattle | $7,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER | $4,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $4,000 |
| LIFE WISE | $4,000 |
| MILLIONAIRE CLUB | $4,000 |
| Reach | $4,000 |
| Domestic Abuse Women's NetworkB | $3,000 |
| Communities In Schools of Seattle | $3,000 |
| MID SOUND FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GRO | $3,000 |
| Ryther League | $3,000 |
| Scholarship Foundation of Northshor | $3,000 |
| CHILDHAVEN | $3,000 |
| HOPELINK | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RMREACH MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +109%
- BCBoyer Children's Clinic8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +141%
- BOBREAD OF LIFE MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- DADOMESTIC ABUSE WOMEN'S NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +48%
LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Provail's mission is to support people with disabilities to fulfill their life choices.
Hopelink inspires hope and provides support for individuals and families experiencing crisis and behavioral health challenges. through innovative services and a collaborative approach, we strengthen our community one life at a time.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
We exist to provide pathways to freedom, safety, and hope for victims of sex trafficking and people involved in the sex trade.
Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
Educate, advocate, and empower to end violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Beginnings and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Lynx Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NAMI Seattle ↗
- Who funds HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER ↗
- Who funds REACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF NORTHSHORE ↗
- Who funds Boyer Children's Clinic ↗
- Who funds BREAD OF LIFE MISSION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
- Who funds North Helpline ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN LYNX ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE OF PROMISE ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD PET ADOPTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHARING ALONGSIDE ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE WOMEN'S NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way of King County · Kawabe Memorial Fund · Fales Foundation Trust · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Medina Foundation · Aven Foundation · NW Childrens Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Loomis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Loomis Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Loomis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.