Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lon a Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$94kEducation$43kPhilanthropy$29kHealth$28kHuman Services$11kFood & Nutrition$7kInternational$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$394k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTBROOK CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$8,700
HNU METHODIST CHURCH$7,155
UNITED WAY$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL$1,000
VALLEY CHURCH$1,000
REMBROOK SCHOOL$1,000
THE JIMMY FUND$500
EAST HARTFORD AMBULANCE ASSOC$500
ST MATTHEWS HOUSE$400
ENFIELD PROJECT$250
GRACE PLACE$200
HEPBURN CULTURE CENTER$200
ARTIS-NAPLES$150
UGS CHRISTMAS FUND$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF GREATER HARTFORD: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$187k · 26 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
26

Total granted

$187k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+10%

Still filing today

42%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +149%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +21%
  • MH
    MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • WC
    WINTONBURY CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • FC
    FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • MI
    MIRACLES IN ACTION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
9
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
10
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
11
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Middlesex Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTBROOK CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $38,620 · OtherWESTBROOK CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHNORTH NAPLES METHODIST CHURCH: $32,685 · OtherNORTH NAPLES METHODIST CHURCHTHE MASTER'S SCHOOL: $27,400 · OtherTHE MASTER'S SCHOOLUNITED WAY: $25,000 · OtherUNITED WAYCT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL FOUNDATIONWINTONBURY CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherWINTONBURY CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $7,200 · OtherHNU METHODIST CHURCH: $7,155 · Other+36 more: $33,660 · Other+36 moreMasonic Charity Foundation of CT: $3,000 · HealthMIDDLESEX HOSPITAL: $1,750 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,200 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 · HealthEAST HAMPTON AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $750 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthRENBROOK SCHOOL INC: $4,750 · EducationVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $1,000 · EducationSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,082 · InternationalMIRACLES IN ACTION INC: $2,000 · InternationalST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $3,150 · Housing & ShelterFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC: $1,250 · Arts & CultureIVORYTON PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $600 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES INC: $150 · Arts & CultureBIKES FOR KIDS INC: $200 · Recreation & SportsYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC: $200 · Human Services
Other$211,720Health$8,300Education$5,750International$4,082Housing & Shelter$3,150Arts & Culture$2,000Recreation & Sports$200Human Services$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MASTER'S SCHOOL: $27,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRENBROOK SCHOOL INC: $4,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $3,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMasonic Charity Foundation of CT: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,082 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLES IN ACTION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMIDDLESEX HOSPITAL: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC: $1,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS AGENCY INC: $1,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBromleigh Enterprises Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEAST HAMPTON AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVORYTON PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MASTER'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RENBROOK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Masonic Charity Foundation of CT ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Bromleigh Enterprises Inc ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds EAST HAMPTON AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IVORYTON PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aetna Foundation IncCT18.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aetna Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Kitchings Family Foundation · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lon a Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lon a Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Access Agency Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Florence Griswold Museum Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Middlesex Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lon a Smith Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph