Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lois Lehrman Grass Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$467kPhilanthropy$230kHuman Services$214kFood & Nutrition$15kHealth$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEducation$4kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAY ON PHILLY$35,561
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG$25,000
MARKET SQUARE CONCERTS$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $40k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $40k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $40k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $40k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $25k → 12%HOSPICE OF CENTRAL PA: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 8 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$494k
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+7%

Still filing today

63%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MARKET SQUARE CONCERTS
    3× · 2018–2021 · $39k · revenue +37%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK
    3× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +54%
  • SF
    SUSQUEHANNA FOLK MUSIC SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CR
    CAPITAL REGION ARTS AND EDUCATION
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museumgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +34%
  • OS
    Open Stage of Harrisburg
    one grant, 2018 · $28k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concerto Soloists Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia

To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…

Arts & Culture
2
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
3
Philadelphia Chamber Music Society

To engage our community in a life more beautiful through the shared experience and transformative impact of chamber music, by arranging diverse and compelling programs by exceptional artists at affordable prices, and by presenting new…

Arts & Culture
4
Philadelphia Festival of the Arts Inc

To promote the cultural richness of philadelphia and to bring the most distinguished work in the arts to audiences in the philadelphia region

—
5
Central Pennsylvania Festival of the Arts

To promote interest in an appreciation for and enjoyment of the arts. to conduct festivals of the arts. to plan and conduct other programs which will advance the arts and improve an appreciation for and enjoyment of the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Cumberland Valley School of Music

To create a musical community where high quality instruction and performance opportunities are available to all.

Arts & Culture
7
Charleston Symphony Orchestra

The charleston symphony's mission is to inspire and engage the community through exceptional musical performances and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
8
Chamber Music Pittsburgh

To present world class chamber music ensembles and soloists, promising emerging artists, and innovative programs; and to foster an appreciation for chamber music in the pittsburgh community by offering educational programs and experiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Citizens for the Arts in Pennsylvania

Citizens for the arts in pennsylvania (cfa/pa) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization advocating for funding and for public policies, all to ensure the vibrant practice and appreciation of the arts and culture across the commonwealth of…

Arts & Culture
10
Pittsburgh Public Theater Corporation

The mission of pittsburgh public theater is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences of the highest quality. pittsburgh public theater also strives to serve, challenge, stimulate, and (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
11
Chamber Orchestra of Southern Maryland in Concert Inc

Cosmic symphony nurtures the performance of high quality orchestral music, showcasing southern maryland talent.

Arts & Culture
12
Pittsburgh Symphony Inc

It is the mission of the pittsburgh symphony orchestra to engage, enrich, and inspire through unparalleled live musical experiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harrisburg Symphony Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hospice of Central Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $213,548 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICECAPITAL REGION ARTS AND EDUCATION: $100,000 · OtherCAPITAL REGION ARTS AND EDUCATIONGAMUT THEATRE: $65,000 · OtherGAMUT THEATREJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+6 more: $20,500 · OtherHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $61,000 · Arts & CultureHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INCSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM: $52,500 · Arts & CultureSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUMThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $50,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memoria…MARKET SQUARE CONCERTS: $39,000 · Arts & CultureMARKET SQUARE CONCERTSPLAY ON PHILLY: $35,561 · Arts & CulturePLAY ON PHILLYOpen Stage of Harrisburg: $27,500 · Arts & CultureOpen Stage of HarrisburgCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET: $13,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $13,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $185,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF G…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $15,000 · Food & NutritionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$444,048Arts & Culture$291,561Human Services$190,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $185,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $61,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM: $52,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARKET SQUARE CONCERTS: $39,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetPLAY ON PHILLY: $35,561 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOpen Stage of Harrisburg: $27,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET: $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHARRISBURG COMMUNITY THEATRE THEATRE HARRISBURG: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCULTURAL ENRICHMENT FUND: $6,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Harrisburg Assoc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Capital RegionPA28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Capital Region · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · Hall Foundation · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Anne & Philip Glatfelter III Family Foundation · Schwab-Silfen Foundation · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · The S Wilson and Grace M Pollock Foundation · McInroy-Sheffer People Trust Ta · The Dorothy B and S Lawrence Koplovitz

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lois Lehrman Grass Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lois Lehrman Grass Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lois Lehrman Grass Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lois Lehrman Grass Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lois Lehrman Grass’ filings →

    More from the funding graph