Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dorothy B and S Lawrence Koplovitz

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$318kEducation$270kHuman Services$44kHealth$22kReligion$18kPhilanthropy$12kYouth Development$1kAnimals$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
$8,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$15,500
GRETNA PRODUCTIONS INC$15,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER$14,117
DAUPHIN COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER$10,000
KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES$8,500
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET$2,500
CHISUK EMUNA CONGREGATION$2,000
GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA$1,000
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CAPITAL AREA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$734
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$682k · 15 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -2% since the first grant, against -73% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$682k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
-73%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GRETNA PRODUCTIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +10%
  • RD
    RABBI DAVID L SILVER YESHIVA ACADEMY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +10%
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CHARTER SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SILVER ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue -73%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Public School of Germantown

Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…

Education
2
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
3
Philadelphia Performing Arts a String Theory Charter School

Charter school providing students a content rich, adademically rigerous core knowledge education with a well-defined, sequential curriculum in a safe, orderly disiplined and caring environment.

Education
4
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
5
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
6
The German Society of Pennsylvania

The german society of pennsylvania seeks to further the understanding of german and german american contributions to the growth of american history and culture from the past to the present and into the future.

7
Historical Society of Pennsylvania

To inspire individuals and organizations to create a better future through historical understanding.

8
Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry

The pennsylvania chamber of business and industry is the largest broad-based business association in pennsylvania. thousands of members throughout the commonwealth employ greater than 50 percent of pennsylvania's private workforce.…

9
Concerto Soloists Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia

To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…

Arts & Culture
10
Allentown Symphony Association Inc

Incorporated on july 2, 1951, the allentown symphony association (asa) is the operating organization of the allentown symphony orchestra (aso)and miller symphony hall (msh). the mission of the asa is to provide a first-class orchestra and…

Arts & Culture
11
Pittsburgh Symphony Inc

It is the mission of the pittsburgh symphony orchestra to engage, enrich, and inspire through unparalleled live musical experiences.

Arts & Culture
12
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harrisburg Symphony Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Birdlife International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
4/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRETNA PRODUCTIONS INC — $158,675 · OtherGRETNA PRODUCTIONS INCKIRKSVILLE COLLEGE AT STILL UNIVERSITY — $148,022 · OtherKIRKSVILLE COLLEGE AT STILL UNIVERSITYBRENNER FAMILY EARLY LEARNING — $56,189 · OtherBRENNER FAMILY EARLY LEARNINGJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER — $24,617 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATERCHISUK EMUNA CONGREGATION — $16,038 · Other+3 more — $19,205 · OtherHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC — $120,133 · Arts & CultureHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSO…SUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM — $20,001 · Arts & CultureSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUMCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET — $11,500 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOU…+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureDAUPHIN COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM — $65,000 · EducationDAUPHIN COU…+2 more — $3,234 · EducationKEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES — $22,086 · HealthJEWISH HOME OF GREATER HARRISBURG — $19,311 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG — $2,000 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 · Animals
Other$422,746Arts & Culture$152,634Education$68,234Health$41,397Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$2,000Youth Development$1,000Animals$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRETNA PRODUCTIONS INC — $158,675 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC — $120,133 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetDAUPHIN COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM — $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES — $22,086 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM — $20,001 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH HOME OF GREATER HARRISBURG — $19,311 over 6y, 19% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET — $11,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRABBI DAVID L SILVER YESHIVA ACADEMY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CHARTER SCHOOL — $1,234 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY DAUPHIN COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRETNA PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds HARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds DAUPHIN COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM
  • Who funds KEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME OF GREATER HARRISBURG
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG
  • Who funds RABBI DAVID L SILVER YESHIVA ACADEMY
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS CHARTER SCHOOL
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY DAUPHIN COUNTY
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · United Way of the Capital Region · The S Wilson and Grace M Pollock Foundation · Alexander and Jane Boyd Ta Foundation · Hall Foundation · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · Schwab-Silfen Foundation · The Carole Desoto Foundation · McInroy-Sheffer People Trust Ta

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dorothy B and S Lawrence Koplovitz funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph